The funding sources of implantology research in the period 2008‐2017: A bibliometric analysis

Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo; Tarazona-Álvarez, Beatriz; Lucas-Domínguez, Rut; Peñarrocha‐Oltra, David; Vidal-Infer, Antonio

doi:10.1111/cid.12810

Cited by 19 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding the financing of articles, governments are the greatest funders, unlike other medical disciplines where companies tend to have the greatest share when financing studies (de Granda et al, 2016). Governments and foundations are predominantly from powerful countries such as the United States and China; however, the companies that have the highest funding are from countries with a tradition in implantology, such as Switzerland (ITI) or Sweden (Nobel Biocare), with similar results being found in bibliometric studies of implantology 13 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

“…There are various bibliometric studies that address various aspects of periodontology and implantology 12–17 . The study by Chiang and colleagues shows that scientific literature on implant complications including peri‐implant pathologies has increased notably in recent decades, at a rate of 5.5% in 1987–1996, 11.1% in 1997–2006, and 13.6% in 2007–2016 18 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production of literature on peri‐implant diseases in the Web of Science

Tarazona-Álvarez

López-Roldán

Vidal-Infer

et al. 2021

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The exponential increase in implant placement worldwide and the high prevalence of its associated pathologies have prompted an increasing contribution by the scientific community to the number of publications related to peri‐implant pathologies. Purpose The objective of this work is to carry out a bibliometric analysis of scientific production on peri‐implant diseases. Materials and Methods The search strategy included titles, keywords, and abstracts based on the term peri‐implantitis and all the possible combinations existing in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) of the main collection of Web of Science. Two limits were established: the document typology was limited to Article and Review, and articles published up to 2019 were selected. All articles were refined and standardized manually to avoid typographical errors and duplications in authors' names or institutions. Results The total number of papers collected was 2547. A significant increase was observed in the number of articles published, especially in the past 10 years. The three most productive authors were Europeans, and the 45 most productive institutions were the universities. The most productive funding entities were the governments. Of the published works, 42.28% were funded. Of the 2547 records, 86.53% presented keywords. Conclusions Scientific literature on peri‐implantitis shows scientific growth in recent years, with a growing trend towards collaboration between authors and institutions. Most of the works have been published in high‐impact journals, and in the last 2 years, more than half of the works have received some type of public or private funding.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production of literature on peri‐implant diseases in the Web of Science

Tarazona-Álvarez

López-Roldán

Vidal-Infer

et al. 2021

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is enough evidence on the use of bibliometric methods in the field of medical science and health [ 4 , 7 , 8 ], but it is limited in dentistry to only a few topics—prosthodontics [ 9 ], orthodontics [ 10 , 11 ], oro-facial pain [ 12 , 13 , 14 ], implantology [ 15 , 16 ] and general dental health [ 9 , 17 ]. Some of the bibliometric studies related to dentistry deliberated on specific countries or regions [ 18 , 19 , 20 ] and others focused on specific databases like International Scientific Indexing (ISI), Scopus or PubMed [ 3 , 21 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Dental Publications in PubMed Databases between 2009 and 2019—A Bibliometric Analysis

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to evaluate the publications in the field of dentistry on the PubMed database over a span of 10 years, from 2009 to 2019. Articles published between January 2009 to December 2019 were searched for in the MEDLINE database via PubMed. Data analysis was done using R-base packages, including the specialized R-packages Bibliometrix and String. For descriptive statistics and sequence charting, SPSS version 23.0 was used. A total of 104,975 articles were extracted, with a total of 153,530 authors in the given time frame. The proportion of articles steadily increased from 2009, plateauing at its peak from 2010 to 2016, and then seeing a decline from 2017 to 2019. Journal articles (60.58%), comparative studies (16.05%) and case reports (10.8%) were recorded as the most reported type of publication globally, accounting for 81.43% of the total documents extracted. All the articles came from 81 countries, with the USA reporting the greatest number of published articles (45,911). Dentistry proves to be a multi-faceted arena and many researchers and authors around the globe are contributing to the burgeoning literature over time.

show abstract

“…More than half of the articles were funded, similar to dental implantology, although most of the financing entities were corporate rather than governmental ( 23 ). The entities funding implantology studies were similar to those funding peri-implant pathology studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 100 most cited articles in peri-implant diseases. A bibliometric study of de web of science

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The purpose of the study was to analyze the 100 most-cited articles on peri-implantitis pathology in the Web of Science database. Material and Methods The articles were selected from all categories of the Web of Science, to consider all variations and synonyms of peri-implant disease. Articles were reviewed for typographical, transcription, and indexing errors. Results The top 100 most-cited articles were published from 1994 to 2018, and had a total of 24,103 citations; 53 of the studies were funded. In total, 274 authors contributed to the papers, 5 of whom contributed to 10 or more articles. Review (n = 47) and clinical (n = 45) articles were the most prevalent types. European public universities made the largest contribution to the literature, and Sweden and Switzerland were the most active countries. All of the articles were published in 12 high-impact-factor journals. Conclusions This is the first analysis of the most-cited articles on periimplantitis published in the Web of Science. In this bibliometric analysis, the most cited articles were published in high-impact-factor journals and were predominantly review articles. The most-cited authors are also active in other scientific disciplines such as periodontics. Key words: Dental implantation, Dental implants, Peri-implantitis, Mucositis.

show abstract

The funding sources of implantology research in the period 2008‐2017: A bibliometric analysis

Cited by 19 publications

References 9 publications

Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production of literature on peri‐implant diseases in the Web of Science

Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production of literature on peri‐implant diseases in the Web of Science

Global Dental Publications in PubMed Databases between 2009 and 2019—A Bibliometric Analysis

The 100 most cited articles in peri-implant diseases. A bibliometric study of de web of science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About