2020
DOI: 10.1525/joae.2020.1.3.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Autoethnography is Black

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with an intention of shedding light on multiple experiences, we (Asha and Hope) asked our mothers a set of questions to guide our conversations and assist in our analysis, interpretation, and meaning-making processes with each other and ourselves. Following the work of Durham et al (2020) who declared that the future of autoethnography was Black and that this work is radical-we dared to ask and answer the questions. Using Boylorn's (2015) Boylorn (2015) declares "Telling was murder and I anxiously became a coconspirator, killing the silence with the story."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with an intention of shedding light on multiple experiences, we (Asha and Hope) asked our mothers a set of questions to guide our conversations and assist in our analysis, interpretation, and meaning-making processes with each other and ourselves. Following the work of Durham et al (2020) who declared that the future of autoethnography was Black and that this work is radical-we dared to ask and answer the questions. Using Boylorn's (2015) Boylorn (2015) declares "Telling was murder and I anxiously became a coconspirator, killing the silence with the story."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their unwavering vigor that conjures Hurston and other Black organic intellectuals takes QI to task for its racialized assumptions and the coloniality of the researcher. Recently, Aisha Durham et al (2020) argue autoethnography’s future is Black. By Black, they hail a Blackness that does not sit within an ontological lack but rather as an “ontology of resistance” harnessed by the Black autoethnographer to “author or rescript” new and emergent identities and experiences (p. 290).…”
Section: Unsettling the Coloniality Of The Researchermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anjuliet Woodruffe illuminates: “Again, if we are going back to identity as a discursive praxis, it is based on interaction. Even though we write about the self, we’re writing about the self in relation-to” (Durham et al, 2020, p. 295). Hurston, like Shakur, like Malcolm X, like Maria de Jesus, all write about the Black self but one that is grounded in relations to a Black community that represents home rather than the field.…”
Section: Unsettling the Coloniality Of The Researchermentioning
confidence: 99%