Modernising Charity Law 2010
DOI: 10.4337/9781849807975.00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Civil Society Organisations: Towards a Theory of Regulation for Organised Civil Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precise variations, nuances, and expressions of U.K. charity law, and the ways in which the U.K.’s charity sectors have evolved, have been widely explored in the literature (Alcock, 2009, 2012; Breen et al, 2009; Garton, 2009; Morgan, 2012; O’Halloran et al, 2008). Within this body of work, there is a small subset focused on foundations.…”
Section: National Legal Differences For Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The precise variations, nuances, and expressions of U.K. charity law, and the ways in which the U.K.’s charity sectors have evolved, have been widely explored in the literature (Alcock, 2009, 2012; Breen et al, 2009; Garton, 2009; Morgan, 2012; O’Halloran et al, 2008). Within this body of work, there is a small subset focused on foundations.…”
Section: National Legal Differences For Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, English acts and statutes on charity and trusts that evolved from the 13th century onward and cumulated in the 1601 Statutes of Charitable Uses provided the roots and basis for charity law in the United States, as well as inspiration for developments in Canada, Australia, and even Japan (Kelley, 2005; Simon, Breen, Avtonomov, Dadrawala, Hasan and Smith, 2016). On top of historic links, contemporary charity law in England and the United States has also tended to develop along parallel paths: “there is more that is similar than different” (Fremont-Smith, 2004, p. 114; see also Garton, 2009; Kiger, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%