2016
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The future of clinical trials: data sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data sharing is by no means accepted, universal, or easy across scientific fields; psychology and the biomedical sciences are (occasionally egregious) exemplars. For example, a recent controversy in the New England Journal of Medicine arose when two authors referred to users of data collected by others as ‘research parasites’ (Drazen, 2016; Longo and Drazen, 2016) and were subsequently hammered by several critics (Berger et al., 2016; Emmert-Streib et al., 2016; Fecher and Wagner, 2016a; Fecher and Wagner, 2016b; Greene et al., 2017; Hirsch, 2017). One of the big issues was whether primary investigators could demand that subsequent users of data be obliged to work and publish only in collaboration with them.…”
Section: Reproducibility and Replicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data sharing is by no means accepted, universal, or easy across scientific fields; psychology and the biomedical sciences are (occasionally egregious) exemplars. For example, a recent controversy in the New England Journal of Medicine arose when two authors referred to users of data collected by others as ‘research parasites’ (Drazen, 2016; Longo and Drazen, 2016) and were subsequently hammered by several critics (Berger et al., 2016; Emmert-Streib et al., 2016; Fecher and Wagner, 2016a; Fecher and Wagner, 2016b; Greene et al., 2017; Hirsch, 2017). One of the big issues was whether primary investigators could demand that subsequent users of data be obliged to work and publish only in collaboration with them.…”
Section: Reproducibility and Replicationmentioning
confidence: 99%