European Political Cooperation 1982
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-408-10663-4.50016-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The future of European Political Cooperation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time it was predominantly a loose, intergovernmental cooperation mechanism to coordinate foreign political decisions in a wider international environment. Rummel (1982, 168) described the EPC as “less a means for the Europeans to transform the structure of international relations fundamentally and more a method for adaptation to given structural circumstances”. As early as 1976, in consideration of the Tindemans 3 report, the then nine foreign ministers of the EC noted that “EPC must ultimately lead to a common foreign policy” (CVCE 2011b).…”
Section: A Long History Of Aligning Policy Agendas In External Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the time it was predominantly a loose, intergovernmental cooperation mechanism to coordinate foreign political decisions in a wider international environment. Rummel (1982, 168) described the EPC as “less a means for the Europeans to transform the structure of international relations fundamentally and more a method for adaptation to given structural circumstances”. As early as 1976, in consideration of the Tindemans 3 report, the then nine foreign ministers of the EC noted that “EPC must ultimately lead to a common foreign policy” (CVCE 2011b).…”
Section: A Long History Of Aligning Policy Agendas In External Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPC, more specifically, was also based on such thought. Rummel (1982, 152) pointed to processes of “simultaneous ‘internationalization’ of some special problems (Spain‐Gibraltar‐UK; Greece‐Cyprus‐Turkey)” that arise from an extension of the EC’s structures for interaction to newly acceding members. This would then allow for those problems to be dealt with in a ‘civilianized’ or ‘domesticated’ way and thus increase political stability in the then “ ‘new’ democracies of Southern Europe”.…”
Section: A Long History Of Aligning Policy Agendas In External Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%