2013
DOI: 10.1111/agec.12089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models

Abstract: Journal articleIFPRI3; ISI; CRP2EPTD; PIMPRCGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
318
1
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 459 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
318
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Without climate change, the agriculture-economic model projects an increase in global food availability of 289 kilocalories per person per day (kcal/cap/day) between the years 2010 and 2050 (10·3%); global fruit and vegetable consumption, net of food waste, is projected to increase by 35·8 grams per person per day (g/cap/day), and global red meat consumption, net of food waste, to increase by 3·9 g/cap/day. Consumption changes in terms of million tonnes per year are larger, agree with the current range of projections, 30 and are reported in Appendix A8.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Without climate change, the agriculture-economic model projects an increase in global food availability of 289 kilocalories per person per day (kcal/cap/day) between the years 2010 and 2050 (10·3%); global fruit and vegetable consumption, net of food waste, is projected to increase by 35·8 grams per person per day (g/cap/day), and global red meat consumption, net of food waste, to increase by 3·9 g/cap/day. Consumption changes in terms of million tonnes per year are larger, agree with the current range of projections, 30 and are reported in Appendix A8.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A recent comparison of global economic models of agriculture showed a wide range of projections of production and consumption across models. 6,30 We used the harmonized scenario inputs developed for the comparison, and we adopted an economic model whose demand projections fell within the middle two quartiles of the range of model results. 30 This means that our economic analysis represents average economic impacts without economic uncertainty intervals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This middle-of-the-road scenario assumes a world population of nine billion people in 2050 and a global GDP that more than triples to 230 trillion US Dollars at 2005 prices and adjusted for purchasing power parity (USD_05 PPP) 29 . Population groups which gain in prosperity demand a more affluent diet with a higher share of livestock products 30 . Therefore, crop production for food and feed increases by more than 50% compared with 2010, mainly by intensifying existing cropland.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop residues can be recycled to soils, burned in the fields, used as feed or used as material 4 . The demand for food enters the model as an exogenous trajectory 4,30 . Demand for material consumption and production waste is assumed to grow over time in proportion to food demand, while the demand for seed is a fixed share of crop production 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%