2021
DOI: 10.1149/2.f06213f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Nuclear Energy: Electrochemical Reprocessing of Fuel Takes Center Stage

Abstract: Nuclear power plants use energy-dense fuel and provide dependable baseload energy without generating greenhouse gas emissions. Despite these advantages, the long-term management of used nuclear fuel (UNF) remains a key challenge due to its lifetime (hundreds of thousands of years) and radiotoxicity. The components of UNF that contribute the most to this challenge are the actinide elements. A potential solution to this issue is to separate these radioisotopes from the bulk of the UNF and recycle them as fuel in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the 1960s, with the development of the MSRE, there has been a push to characterize actinides, lanthanides, and many other metals relevant to MSR fuel and used fuel recycling in molten salt media. 3,57 The core concepts of electrochemistry before this point were largely applied to aqueous systems, not molten salts. As a basis to the critical analysis of the molten salt literature, these core concepts developed in room temperature aqueous systems provide valuable background.…”
Section: Core Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the 1960s, with the development of the MSRE, there has been a push to characterize actinides, lanthanides, and many other metals relevant to MSR fuel and used fuel recycling in molten salt media. 3,57 The core concepts of electrochemistry before this point were largely applied to aqueous systems, not molten salts. As a basis to the critical analysis of the molten salt literature, these core concepts developed in room temperature aqueous systems provide valuable background.…”
Section: Core Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,54 After the UNF assemblies are cut into pieces, they are placed inside a fuel basket usually made of stainless steel. 53,57,77 No further processing is done to the UNF assemblies after they are chopped. Zirconium is a material present in the cladding and is known to complicate the electrorefining behavior of uranium.…”
Section: Electrochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spent nuclear fuel reprocessing, the electrochemical recovery of actinides and fission products from molten salts takes advantage of the high conductivity, wider working potential ranges, and radiochemical stability of molten salts compared to conventional aqueous solutions. 1 The spent fuel treatment process from EBR-II was the first pilot-scale demonstration of pyroprocessing where a product stream of metallic uranium was successfully recovered, leaving behind the stainless steel cladding, fuel metal wastes and leftover salt wastes from the electrorefiners that were fixed and isolated into glass-bonded sodalite ceramic. [2][3][4] During this electrorefining process, actinides are separated from unwanted fission products to be reprocessed back into nuclear fuel (U, Pu).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above considerations, momentum is now building to examine in detail the LiF-CaF 2 eutectic molten salt system for the separation of actinides from lanthanides or rare earth elements from the spent nuclear fuel. 6,7 Consequently, it has now become essential to understand the electrochemistry of Zr 4+ in this molten salt for the reprocessing of U-Zr and U-Pu-Zr metallic spent fuels and because zirconium, which is also produced as a fission product, needs to be extracted from the spent fuel in Gen-IV molten salt reactors. In the longer term, the knowledge will assist in the evaluation of the potential of an MSR as a breeder system based on 232 Th/ 233 U cycle with lower radioactive waste level compared to that in a U based nuclear reactor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%