2001
DOI: 10.1007/s12122-001-1031-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The future of private sector unions in the U.S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For employers, keeping their workplace outside the scrutiny of the Labor Court relies on sustaining union membership at a minimum, thus repressing the efforts of union activists. Lipset and Katchanovski (2001) argue that libertarian and individualist values hamper U.S. private sector unionism more strongly than employer hostility does. In contrast, Comstock and Fox (1994) assert that claims suggesting employer resistance does not play a significant role in union decline defy common sense.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For employers, keeping their workplace outside the scrutiny of the Labor Court relies on sustaining union membership at a minimum, thus repressing the efforts of union activists. Lipset and Katchanovski (2001) argue that libertarian and individualist values hamper U.S. private sector unionism more strongly than employer hostility does. In contrast, Comstock and Fox (1994) assert that claims suggesting employer resistance does not play a significant role in union decline defy common sense.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absent such a consensus, we are likely to see a continued marginalization of unions in the private sector, increasing governmental regulation of labor markets, and an underprovision of value-enhancing voice in the workplace. IFor example, see Freeman (1997), Farber and Western (2000), and Lipset and Katchanovski (2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work by Farber (1990) and Farber and Krueger (1992) has concluded that weakened preferences for unionism explain much of the decline over time. Lipset and Katchanovski (2001) measure preferences associated with social democratic or collectivist values, as compared to individualistic values. They conclude that more than in other countries, U.S. workers tend to be far more individualistic and that this perspective helps explain the low levels of private sector density.…”
Section: Why Has Private Sector Unionism Declined?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U.S. has been experiencing a steady decline in trade union membership rates over the last forty years, reaching a seventy-year-low in 2010. This decline is seen largely as a private sector phenomenon (Lipset and Katchanovski, 2001;18 Exceptions to this surrender occurred during the war. The most important one of which was the coal strike led by the United Mine Workers in 1943.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%