The Future of Sustainable Urbanism: Society-Based, Complexity-Led, and Landscape-Driven

Roggema, Rob

doi:10.3390/su9081442

Cited by 30 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this sense, two questions still remained uncertain and needed to be explicitly analyzed: (1) In the process of an active economic integration through ethnic economy, a more active integration route, what are the roles played by the two traditionally highlighted actors (e.g., immigrants, natives)? (2) Enlightened by the "three-way approach" model, aside from the natives and immigrants, is there a third or fourth actor exerting influence on the integration process?…”

Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Meanwhile, the cultural contrast between natives and immigrants is also intensive, especially in religious and ethnic issues [1]. In this sense, an exclusionary and discriminatory attitude towards lower-skill immigrants has emerged in receiving societies, deepening the economic, social, and cultural conflicts between natives and immigrants [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

From Passive to Active: A Multiplayer Economic Integration Process of Turkish Immigrants in Berlin

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Recently, economic integration of lower-skill immigrants in Western countries has become the most researched area in ethnic studies. Traditional studies have highlighted the influences of immigration policy and economic structure in the host society. This paradigm perceives immigrants as a passive actor in the economic integration process. Recently, more studies have paid attention to the active influence of lower-skill immigrants (e.g., informality, social and human capital accumulation, ethnic economy), presenting an academic transformation from passive to active economic integration. However, this transformation is disputed as the lower-skill immigrants' active integration behavior does not affirmatively represent successful economic integration. Moreover, inspired by the "three-way approach" model, whether lower-skill immigrants could successfully integrate may also depend on actors beyond the natives and lower-skill immigrants (e.g., visitors). In this sense, two questions remain uncertain: (1) In the process of an active economic integration, what are the roles played by the two traditionally highlighted actors? (2) Enlightened by the "three-way approach" model, is there a third or fourth actor exerting influences in the active economic integration process? To answer these questions, from a food ethnic economy perspective, we analyzed how actors play roles in the Turkish immigrants' economic integration process in Mitte, Berlin. Through our fieldwork observations and interviews, we concluded that (1) there are four actors in total (e.g., Turkish immigrants, Germans, non-Turkish immigrants, and transnational visitors) in the Turkish integration process, presenting a multiplayer model distinct from the traditional bi-player research framework; (2) Turkish immigrants launched the Turkish food ethnic economy through actively adjusting their ethnic food's eating forms; (3) Germans promote the economic integration of Turkish immigrants by providing a larger market for Turkish ethnic food; and (4) non-Turkish immigrants and transnational visitors also promote the integration process through consumption.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Passive to Active: A Multiplayer Economic Integration Process of Turkish Immigrants in Berlin

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…"Ecotown" concepts planned as new sustainable communities in the United Kingdom claim to achieve this, but paradoxically are planned on "greenfield" sites formerly used for agriculture and grazing (Knight and Riggs, 2010). Sustainability has been a component of urbanism for a long time, but in distinct respects and distinct phases of history (Roggema, 2016(Roggema, , 2017. Sustainable urbanism has evolved to suit design principles that are sustainability-and resilient city-friendly (Roggema, 2016).…”

Section: Edible Urbanismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sustainability has been a component of urbanism for a long time, but in distinct respects and distinct phases of history (Roggema, 2016(Roggema, , 2017. Sustainable urbanism has evolved to suit design principles that are sustainability-and resilient city-friendly (Roggema, 2016). Sustainable urbanism looks at the city as an ecosystem, much like an urban metabolism defining city flows and interactions.…”

Section: Edible Urbanismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sustainable urbanism looks at the city as an ecosystem, much like an urban metabolism defining city flows and interactions. Roggema (2017) states "the degree to which the system is able to deal with the flows, or networks of traffic, energy and materials, determines the sustainability of the system". In the concept called the strategy of the two networks, higher dynamic uses (i.e., traffic, industries and intensive forms of agriculture) connected to the transportation network while lower dynamic uses (i.e., nature, green, water and residential) link to the water network (Roggema, 2017;Tjallingii, 2015).…”

Section: Edible Urbanismmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Edible urbanism 5.0

Russo

Cirella

2019

Palgrave Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban and peri-urban agriculture can have negative effects (i.e., ecosystem disservices) to the city ecosystem. In the last two decades, urbanists and landscape planners have promoted urban agriculture and food systems with little attention to ecosystem disservices. At present, increased urbanisation, environmental degradation, population growth and changes in food systems require a novel concept that considers trade-offs between ecosystem services and disservices. Considering the Sustainable Development Goal 2 of ending hunger and all forms of malnutrition by 2030, as well as the food revolution 5.0 of feeding up to ten billion people, edible urbanism 5.0 is a supportive component in reaching these goals. In this comment, edible urbanism via an edible green infrastructure (EGI) approach is examined against current urbanistic concepts that have common food production systems in cities. Moreover, a discussion on issues and challenges of public policy and governance for the implementation of sustainable food systems is shown with findings that consider current industrial intensive farming as somewhat unsustainable. Edible urbanism integrates three main principles of sustainability by fulfilling food security, resilience and social inclusion. It links site-specific, best-practices by integrating EGI-based governance with modernised food production techniques. Example cities showing EGI-and sustainability-oriented food concepts are presented. Recommendations for future edible urbanism (as a part of the next food revolution) are established.

show abstract

Australia’s Urban Biodiversity: How Is Adaptive Governance Influencing Land-Use Policy?

Stanford

Bush

2020

Smart and Sustainable Cities and Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Future of Sustainable Urbanism: Society-Based, Complexity-Led, and Landscape-Driven

Cited by 30 publications

References 49 publications

From Passive to Active: A Multiplayer Economic Integration Process of Turkish Immigrants in Berlin

From Passive to Active: A Multiplayer Economic Integration Process of Turkish Immigrants in Berlin

Edible urbanism 5.0

Australia’s Urban Biodiversity: How Is Adaptive Governance Influencing Land-Use Policy?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About