DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87875-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Train Signaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our work we give more elaborated classification of interferences, check their confluence using graph transformation based tools, define solutions, formalize them and implement in the substitution engine 1 . Svendsen et al [18] analyze conflicts in CVL on a Train Control Language (TCL) [19] example. They discuss two kinds of conflicts: border inconsistency and element inconsistency.…”
Section: Conflicts In Cvlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work we give more elaborated classification of interferences, check their confluence using graph transformation based tools, define solutions, formalize them and implement in the substitution engine 1 . Svendsen et al [18] analyze conflicts in CVL on a Train Control Language (TCL) [19] example. They discuss two kinds of conflicts: border inconsistency and element inconsistency.…”
Section: Conflicts In Cvlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The running example will apply the Train Control Language (TCL) [2] which is a DSL for modeling train stations to automate the production of code for train station signaling systems.…”
Section: Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are DSLs for feature modeling, where feature diagrams have to be supported, and TCL [24], a train control language, where the descriptions have to have the forms of tracks, switches, lights, etc.…”
Section: Domain Specific Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%