1996
DOI: 10.2307/1344708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Value Added Tax in the European Union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(see, e.g., Keen and Smith, 1996). 3 When taxes are set non-cooperatively, however, and countries can affect their terms of trade, then no clear argument emerges in favour of one or the other tax principle (Lockwood, 1993;2001, sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see, e.g., Keen and Smith, 1996). 3 When taxes are set non-cooperatively, however, and countries can affect their terms of trade, then no clear argument emerges in favour of one or the other tax principle (Lockwood, 1993;2001, sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that the VAT does not fit well for local governments due to high administrative and compliance costs, and problems arising from cross-jurisdictional trade and tax fraud, tax exporting, and transfer pricing. But the VAT could be suitable for local governments if it is reorganized, such as the dual VAT system (proposed by Bird and Gendron, 1998), viable integrated VAT (Keen and Smith, 1998), and compensating VAT (Varsano, 2000;McLure, 2000). Among those, the compensating VAT system was originally proposed for developing countries such as Brazil and India.…”
Section: Local Government Taxation Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 See for example, Mintz (1995), Bird (2012, and Keen and Smith (1996). Bird notes, "Quebec is the only subnational jurisdiction in the world to operate a destination-based VAT."…”
Section: Efforts To Enforce Destination Taxation In the European Umentioning
confidence: 99%