The G20 and the Think 20 as new global education policy actors? Discursive analysis of roles and policy ideas

Abstract

PurposeThe Group of Twenty (G20) has substantial influence in global economic policy but has been peripheral in global education governance. There is intensification of education policy-relevant engagement within the Think 20 (T20), the “ideas bank” and official engagement group of the G20. The authors analyse the evolution of education as a policy domain within the T20, the ideas and discursive framing of education and global education policy “solutions” and assumptions about the G20 in education policy engagement.Design/methodology/approachThe authors view the T20 as an external actor that can mobilise policy-relevant ideas to G20 actors responsible for internal policy selection and translation. The analysis covers the period 2018–2021 when education became an explicit T20 policy area. The authors screened all 461 T20 policy briefs across all domains. Of these, 32 briefs and four final T20 Summit communiqués were reviewed using critical discourse analysis. Data were supplemented via organisational websites and tacit professional knowledge.FindingsThree assumptions on the G20 as an actor prevailed: (1) policymaker, (2) policy shaper and (3) knowledge mobiliser. The framing ideas on education were linked to assumptions on drivers of education system reform as intertwined with, or to enable: (1) economic adaptation, (2) technical adaptation and (3) socio-political adaptation of individuals and societies.Originality/valueAccelerated education engagement within the T20 and its direct reach to G20 leaders makes it, and the G20, analytically unique and new unexamined actors of potential influence. The authors conclude that the T20 is positioned as a unique actor, both that can mobilise education policy-relevant ideas to G20 leaders, and legitimised as the actor from which G20 leaders and policymakers should adopt ideas.

Utilization of GPT-4 to Improve Education Quality Through Personalized Learning for Generation Z in Indonesia

“…The implications of this research are far-reaching, extending to various stakeholders in the education sector [10]. For the government and policymakers, the findings of this study could serve as a wake-up call, underscoring the potential benefits and possibilities of incorporating technologies like ChatGPT into the education sector.…”

UNESCO, the OECD and the World Bank: A Global Governance Perspective

“…Although UNESCO still has a coordinating role in the framing and implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4), the UNESCO-driven SDG-4-related 2030 Framework for Action (UNESCO et al, 2016) is being challenged by parallel agendas, such as the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and its expansion to developing countries and the World Bank's "learning agenda" based on the measurement of learning outcomes. New global governance bodies are taking over the role that was traditionally assigned to UNESCO, not only the OECD and the World Bank, but also multistakeholder groups such as the Global Partnership for Education (GPE), the G7 and the G20 (Matovich & Srivastava, 2023;Wulff, 2019).…”