2008
DOI: 10.1086/587539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Galactic Distribution of Infrared Dark Clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
106
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between the distance estimates obtained with the association to IRDCs and the 2MASS extinction is also fairly good, with about a 20% systematic over-estimate of the extinction method compared to the kinetic method, and with a maximum associated discrepancy of 50%. This study is in agreement with the comparison performed by between the distance estimates of Marshall et al (2009), Simon et al (2006b) and Jackson et al (2008) on IRDCs. On the other hand no agreement is obtained between the SDSS extinction and the 2MASS extinction methods on the fraction of objects (144) for which we have both estimates.…”
Section: Combined Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The agreement between the distance estimates obtained with the association to IRDCs and the 2MASS extinction is also fairly good, with about a 20% systematic over-estimate of the extinction method compared to the kinetic method, and with a maximum associated discrepancy of 50%. This study is in agreement with the comparison performed by between the distance estimates of Marshall et al (2009), Simon et al (2006b) and Jackson et al (2008) on IRDCs. On the other hand no agreement is obtained between the SDSS extinction and the 2MASS extinction methods on the fraction of objects (144) for which we have both estimates.…”
Section: Combined Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Four different methods are required to cover all the sources: association with IRDCs; association with known molecular complexes; a three dimensional extinction method using the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS Skrutskie et al 2006); and using Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS, Abazajian et al 2003) data. Simon et al (2006b) and Jackson et al (2008) provide kinematic distance estimates for a total of 497 IRDCs extracted from the MSX catalogue (Simon et al 2006a) that consists of 10 931 objects. Kinematic distances are obtained via the observed radial velocity of gas tracers in the plane of the Galaxy.…”
Section: Distance Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Wat", "SW", "A" correspond to radio sources listed mainly in Watson et al (2003), Sewilo (2004) and . The molecular information is from Dame et al (1986) for "GMC", from Roman-Duval et al (2009) for "GRSMC" clouds, from Solomon et al (1987) for "Sol" clouds, from Jacq et al (1988) for "Bx" clouds and from Simon et al (2006) and Jackson et al (2008) for "IRDC". For "GMC" and "Bx" clouds the radius and velocity FWHM of the cloud is given in brackets.…”
Section: Appendix A: Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of A v and the distance used by the SED fitter is an output from the fitting results, listed in Table 3 along with other parameters. We note that IRDCs in quadrant 4 are typically located at distances of ∼3 kpc (Jackson et al 2008), and distances over ∼8 kpc are unlikely because Spitzer-MIPS 24μm, IRAC 8μm and 3.6μm images are coded as red, green and blue respectively to compose the colour image which reveal the infrared dark filament/cloud. Yellow contours show the 870μm emission (starting at 0.1 Jy, in steps of 0.1 Jy) from the ATLASGAL data tracing the molecular clump associated with the infrared dark cloud.…”
Section: Sed Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%