2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The galaxy size–halo mass scaling relations and clustering properties of central and satellite galaxies

Abstract: In this work, we combine size and stellar mass measurements from the Sloan Digital Sky Server (SDSS) with the group finder algorithm of Rodriguez & Merchán in order to determine the stellar and halo mass – size relations of central and satellite galaxies separately. We show that, while central and satellite galaxies display similar stellar mass – size relations, their halo mass – size relations differ significantly. As expected, more massive haloes tend to host larger central galaxies. However, the size of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of other properties such as spin, concentration or age seem to be equally relevant and significant, but it is important to bear in mind that our prediction for galaxy radius is still not optimal. These results seem to be connected with the shape of the (halo/stellar) mass-size relation (see, e.g., Rodriguez et al 2021): at the high-mass end, central galaxy size is proportional to halo mass, but the relation is basically flat at the low-mass end. Reproducing and physically modeling the scatter in the mass-size relation will be the subject of further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The contribution of other properties such as spin, concentration or age seem to be equally relevant and significant, but it is important to bear in mind that our prediction for galaxy radius is still not optimal. These results seem to be connected with the shape of the (halo/stellar) mass-size relation (see, e.g., Rodriguez et al 2021): at the high-mass end, central galaxy size is proportional to halo mass, but the relation is basically flat at the low-mass end. Reproducing and physically modeling the scatter in the mass-size relation will be the subject of further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Among other advantages, it was found that this galaxy group sample presents excellent agreement between the mass it provides and those obtained by weak gravitational lensing techniques (Gonzalez et al 2021). In addition, it was highly efficient at comparing properties of central and satellite galaxies with the results obtained in simulations (Rodriguez et al 2021). Our final galaxy catalog is a volume-limited sample of galaxies up to z = 0.1, comprising 134405 objects with angular positions, spectroscopic magnitudes, and other astrophysical data, together with their corresponding group and halo host membership and mass.…”
Section: The Group Galaxy Catalogmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…From Equation 7, plus the correlation between the mass enclosed in a GCS (M GCS ) and the halo mass (M h ) from Harris et al (2015), and the r eff,gal -to-M h relations from the literature (e.g. Kravtsov 2013;Rodriguez et al 2021), the r eff,gal and the r eff,GCS come to be related by a power-law with exponent ≈ 1.4 (shown with a dotted line in Fig. 10).…”
Section: Scaling Relations Involving Other Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%