2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-016-1437-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gassmann–Burgers Model to Simulate Seismic Waves at the Earth Crust And Mantle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carcione et al (2014) presented an algorithm to simulate full seismic wave propagation in heterogeneous media in the presence of the BDT, using the Burgers mechanical model and the Arrhenius equation to take into account viscoelastic behavior, temperature dependence, and rock melting conditions. Carcione et al (2016) extended the theory to include poro-viscoelastic media by explicitly modeling the effects of fluids under supercritical conditions. Farina et al (2016) applied this algorithm to simulate full waveforms, demonstrating that discontinuities associated with the transition to supercritical conditions and the presence of magmas can be seismically observable.…”
Section: Conceptual Models and Numerical Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carcione et al (2014) presented an algorithm to simulate full seismic wave propagation in heterogeneous media in the presence of the BDT, using the Burgers mechanical model and the Arrhenius equation to take into account viscoelastic behavior, temperature dependence, and rock melting conditions. Carcione et al (2016) extended the theory to include poro-viscoelastic media by explicitly modeling the effects of fluids under supercritical conditions. Farina et al (2016) applied this algorithm to simulate full waveforms, demonstrating that discontinuities associated with the transition to supercritical conditions and the presence of magmas can be seismically observable.…”
Section: Conceptual Models and Numerical Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P‐wave attenuation (QP1 ${Q}_{P}^{-1}$) to S‐wave attenuation (QS1 ${Q}_{S}^{-1}$) ratio (QP1/QS1 ${Q}_{P}^{-1}/{Q}_{S}^{-1}$) provides important information about the dominant attenuation mechanism owing to the different propagation characteristics of the two seismic waves (e.g., Hauksson & Shearer, 2006; Stachnik et al., 2004). The motion associated with grain‐boundary sliding is mainly enhanced by shear deformation, such that attenuation dominated by these mechanisms should yield QP1/QS1 ${Q}_{P}^{-1}/{Q}_{S}^{-1}$ < 1.0 (e.g., Carcione et al., 2017, 2018; Jackson, 2015; Jackson et al., 2002). However, we often observe QP1/QS1 ${Q}_{P}^{-1}/{Q}_{S}^{-1}$ > 1.0, which cannot be explained by these intergranular mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%