2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10600-021-03311-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GC-MS Analysis of the Essential Oil of Cleome austroarabica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vaporizer temperature and ion-source temperature were respectively adjusted to 280 and 230℃. Each chemical composition was identified by comparing the retention index obtained from a database (NIST05) with the retention indexes calculated on the basis of n-alkanes (C9-C46) (Rehman et al, 2021;Chzhu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Gc-ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vaporizer temperature and ion-source temperature were respectively adjusted to 280 and 230℃. Each chemical composition was identified by comparing the retention index obtained from a database (NIST05) with the retention indexes calculated on the basis of n-alkanes (C9-C46) (Rehman et al, 2021;Chzhu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Gc-ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GC-MS is generally suitable for the analysis of primary metabolites necessary for the survival and reproduction during plant growth and development, such as carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, while LC-MS is more suitable for evaluating a large group of plant secondary metabolites including alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds (t' Kindt et al, 2009). Most studies use GC-MS or LC-MS technology to determine metabolites based on the characteristics of substances (Muráriková et al, 2017;Rehman et al, 2021); however, it is difficult to obtain all the metabolite information using a single detection technique due to the limitations and biases of the technique (Naz et al, 2014;Gonzalez-Dominguez et al, 2017). A few studies have performed multimetabolome analyses so far (Alves Filhoa et al, 2019;Zhou et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%