Please be advised that this information was generated on 2018-05-11 and may be subject to change. Schiller and A. Caramazza (2003) and A. Costa, D. Kovacic, E. Fedorenko, and A. Caramazza (2003) have argued that the processing of freestanding gender-marked morphemes (e.g., determiners) and bound gender-marked morphemes (e.g., adjective suffixes) during syntactic encoding in speech production follows distinct principles, with only freestanding morphemes being subject to a competitive selection process. In 3 experiments, the authors tested this hypothesis in German, extending a previous study by H. Schriefers, J.D. Jescheniak, and A. Hantsch (2002). The results suggest that freestanding and bound morphemes are basically processed in the same way, although competition appears to be attenuated for bound morphemes relative to free morphemes. The authors discuss theoretical and methodological implications of this pattern.
Selection of Gender-Marked Morphemes in Speech ProductionHerbertIn the past years, the (grammatical) gender-congruency effect obtained in variants of the picture-word task has attracted much attention, as it is viewed as a tool for exploring syntactic encoding processes in speech production. At present, however, there is some dispute with respect to both the locus of the effect and its scope.The gender-congruency effect was first described by Schriefers (1993). In this study, speakers of Dutch were instructed to describe colored line drawings of common objects by producing noun phrases consisting of a gender-marked definite determiner, an adjective, and a noun (e.g., de rode tafel [the com red table]; het rode huis [the neut red house]) while hearing distractor words that had to be ignored. 1 These distractors had either the same grammatical gender as the noun of the target utterance (gendercongruent condition) or a different grammatical gender (genderincongruent condition). Naming latencies were longer in the gender-incongruent condition than in the gender-congruent condition (see also LaHeij, Mak, Sander, & Willeboordse, 1998;Schiller & Caramazza, 2003; van Berkum, 1997, for replications in Dutch, andSchiller &Schriefers & Teruel, 2000, for replications in German). A similar interference pattern was obtained when participants produced noun phrases consisting of an adjective with a gender-marked suffix and a noun (e.g., rode tafel [red com table]; rod huis [red neut house]), but the effect was descriptively smaller than it was for noun phrases with definite determiners. These data suggested that the gender-congruency effect is indicative of lexical competition during syntactic processing, regardless of whether the results of these processes surface as freestanding gender-marked morphemes (e.g., determiners) or bound gender-marked morphemes (e.g., adjective suffixes).Schriefers (1993) interpreted the gender-congruency effect as resulting from competition in selecting the abstract gender feature of the target noun (i.e., either common or neuter). In the gendercongruent condition, it is assumed that ...