2003
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gender Congruency Effect and the Selection of Freestanding and Bound Morphemes: Evidence From Croatian.

Abstract: The authors report 3 picture-word interference experiments in which they explore some properties of the agreement process in speech production. In Experiment 1, Croatian speakers were asked to produce utterances in which the noun's gender value had an impact on the selection of gender-marked freestanding morphemes (pronouns) while ignoring the presentation of same- or different-gender distractor words. In Experiments 2 and 3, Croatian speakers were asked to name the same pictures using noun phrases in which th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
63
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(91 reference statements)
7
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the utterances contained gender-marked freestanding determiners, gender-congruent distractors led to faster naming latencies than gender-incongruent distractors (Experiment 1B). 2 Furthermore, given that in Experiment 1A the gender-marked element was an indefinite determiner, this result corroborates the empirical generalization put forward by Costa et al (2003), that is, the presence of a gender congruency effect is independent of whether the noun's gender surfaces in the context of closed class or open class words. That is, gender congruency effects are sometimes present and sometimes absent when the utterance contains closed class words (such as determiners).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, when the utterances contained gender-marked freestanding determiners, gender-congruent distractors led to faster naming latencies than gender-incongruent distractors (Experiment 1B). 2 Furthermore, given that in Experiment 1A the gender-marked element was an indefinite determiner, this result corroborates the empirical generalization put forward by Costa et al (2003), that is, the presence of a gender congruency effect is independent of whether the noun's gender surfaces in the context of closed class or open class words. That is, gender congruency effects are sometimes present and sometimes absent when the utterance contains closed class words (such as determiners).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In contrast to this position but in line with the proposal made by Lapointe and Dell (1989), Costa, Kovacic, Fedorenko, and Caramazza (2003) and Schiller and Caramazza (2003) claimed that the mechanisms by which speakers retrieve freestanding and bound morphemes are different in nature. They argued that gendermarked freestanding morphemes are selected following a selection-by-competition principle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Costa et al (2003) used the gender-congruency effect in the picture-word task to investigate the processing of gender-marked elements in Croatian. In their first experiment, they obtained a gender-congruency effect for utterances with a gender-marked accusative pronoun, in other words, with a free-standing gendermarked morpheme (e. (Costa et al, 2003, Experiments 2 and 3). Costa et al (2003) interpreted this result by assuming that morphophonological processes operating with bound morphemes (like gender-marked suffixes) do not involve a simple concatenation in which a stem and an inflectional suffix are first selected independently and are subsequently combined in a phonological frame.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their first experiment, they obtained a gender-congruency effect for utterances with a gender-marked accusative pronoun, in other words, with a free-standing gendermarked morpheme (e. (Costa et al, 2003, Experiments 2 and 3). Costa et al (2003) interpreted this result by assuming that morphophonological processes operating with bound morphemes (like gender-marked suffixes) do not involve a simple concatenation in which a stem and an inflectional suffix are first selected independently and are subsequently combined in a phonological frame. Rather, they assume that morphophonological processes involve phonological transformations, and thus "the role of grammatical features would not be to select a specific bit of phonological material but to select a phonological transformation" (p. 1279).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%