The Gender Gap in STEM Careers: An Inter-Regional and Transgenerational Experimental Study to Identify the Low Presence of Women

Abstract

Currently, the number of job offers in STEM careers (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) is growing up, but by contrast, the number of graduates in these fields is decreasing, particularly women graduates. Consequently, if we do not promote the training of women in STEM careers, the gender gap, far from narrowing, will continue to widen. This paper presents the research carried out in the ALAS project (Accompanying girLs towArds STEM careers), which consists of an experimental analysis based on a multi-model study to discover the possible causes of this low participation of women in STEM fields. The models used are the (1) expectancy–value theory of motivation, (2) social role theory, and (3) gender stereotypes theory. Additionally, participatory workshops have been carried out, with the aim of capturing the students’ reactions when they are introduced to STEM practices. The surveyed target groups range from primary education groups up to university graduates and enterprise employees, including both students and teachers. The obtained results show that there are still social patterns that make young people differentiate certain types of activities based on gender, especially at secondary school age. Nevertheless, the findings reveal that beyond the three studied models, a key factor in young people’s decision to be enrolled in STEM careers is their educational environment.

Sustainable Gender Equality: A Comparative Perspective on STEM Education and Employment in Jordan

“…This includes the works of Stoet et al [26], Henriksen et al [27], Mainhard et al [28], and Menacho et al [29]. Methodologically, some studies relied on qualitative approaches such as an extensive review of the literature and interviews (such as Warsito et al [30], Martinez et al [31], and Yu et al [32]), whereas others deployed quantitative approaches primarily through questionnaires (such as Cesi and Williams [33], Tandrayen-Ragoobur and Gokulsing [34], and Makarova et al [35]).…”