2012
DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2011.652621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gender implications of large-scale land deals

Abstract: Journal articleIFPRI3; ISI; CRP2; GRP42EPTD; PHND; PIMPRCGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
131
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
131
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are ample studies demonstrating the disproportionate vulnerabilities to and impacts of climate change and related risks experienced by women, there is scarce empirical evidence showing how men and women, respectively, make decisions regarding new land use opportunities that enhance or reduce emissions (Behrman et al 2012). Questions that remain insufficiently answered include: 1) How do males and females differ in terms of their land use perspective?…”
Section: Gender Land Use and Redd+mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While there are ample studies demonstrating the disproportionate vulnerabilities to and impacts of climate change and related risks experienced by women, there is scarce empirical evidence showing how men and women, respectively, make decisions regarding new land use opportunities that enhance or reduce emissions (Behrman et al 2012). Questions that remain insufficiently answered include: 1) How do males and females differ in terms of their land use perspective?…”
Section: Gender Land Use and Redd+mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is therefore vital to study how matrilineal systems are changing in the face of agricultural industrialization, particularly given the pattern emerging in current research that suggests that women are more sensitive to the context of negotiation while men appear to be more responsive to pecuniary costs and benefits (Behrman et al 2012;Eckel et al 2008). …”
Section: Gendered Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, an emerging literature around the gendered impacts of and responses to oil palm links with parallel debates on gender, land rights and large-scale land deals more generally (for example, Behrman, Meinzen-Dick, and Quisumbing 2012;Collins 2016;Daley and Pallas 2014;Archambault and Zoomers 2015). Writing specifically on oil palm investments, Julia and White (2012), Morgan (2013), Li (2015) and de Vos (2016) provide an explicit focus on gender impacts of and responses to oil palm companies in West Kalimantan, whilst Elmhirst and Darmastuti (2015) investigate the interplay between smallholder oil palm investments, emerging multilocal livelihood practices and migrant women's remittances in Lampung Province.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secure land tenure supports the economic and political autonomy that individuals and groups need to participate in democratic society. Human rights analysis must consider diverse groups through multiple stages of land deals from appraisal, to monitoring (Behrman et al 2012). The elderly, the disabled (ACHPR 18.4) and children require special attention (ACHPR 18.3; CRC 4, 6; Save the Children 2002).…”
Section: Justness Of Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some women found (rather poorly paid and uncertain) livelihoods in supplying food to workers. Such gendered effects with regard to land rights, land use, power, information, employment, and livelihoods confirm the importance of gender in transnational land deals (Daley 2011;Behrman et al 2012). In addition to the benefits probably being skewed to the disadvantage of women, right to gender equality was not actively protected and promoted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%