1987
DOI: 10.1086/494385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gendered Meanings of Virtue in Revolutionary America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Helen Haste argues that the idea of gender difference serves as a sort of master metaphor that gives meaning to myriad dualities at the center of Western culture, including public-private, rational-intuitive, active-passive, hard-soft, thinking-feeling, and many more (1993). On the role of gender ideals in the politics of the American founding and early republic, see Kann (1998), Kerber (1986), Kang (2009), andBloch (1987). characteristics such as greedy, hostile, and self-interested, and stereotypes of women include negative traits like spineless and gullible.…”
Section: Masculinity and Femininity In American Culture And Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Helen Haste argues that the idea of gender difference serves as a sort of master metaphor that gives meaning to myriad dualities at the center of Western culture, including public-private, rational-intuitive, active-passive, hard-soft, thinking-feeling, and many more (1993). On the role of gender ideals in the politics of the American founding and early republic, see Kann (1998), Kerber (1986), Kang (2009), andBloch (1987). characteristics such as greedy, hostile, and self-interested, and stereotypes of women include negative traits like spineless and gullible.…”
Section: Masculinity and Femininity In American Culture And Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all of these ways, moreover, gymnastics appeared to intensively prepare US women and girls to undertake their (quasi-)civic charge as guarantors of public virtuewhich was conceptualized increasingly as a product of private benevolence and personal manners -while reinvigorating aspects of Republican motherhood. [156] Conclusions Nancy Struna, as we know, has contextualized nineteenth-century gymnastics for US women within the historical development of a separate sphere of women's sport 1294 A. Chisholm conducted in 'private settings' that ultimately were sanctioned by the cult of domesticity -a concept that was not divorced entirely from public implications or manifestations. [157] This essay has elaborated Struna's assertions by examining discourses that advanced gymnastics for US women between 1830 and 1870 in relation to two sites of proposed and actual institutionalization respectively: within families and within single-sex secondary schools conceptualized in terms of familial structures that were largely defined by the dynamics of maternal care.…”
Section: Housework and Mannersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, according to Jan Lewis (1998: 62), the leaders of the early republic believed that female passions or 'affections' were crucial to binding together society, as long as such emotions did not become too intense nor spill over into the public realm. Ultimately, as Ruth Bloch (1987) traces, women even became the guardians of republican virtue in the private sphere, freeing up men to pursue their individual economic interests in the public sphere. This liberal conception was a far cry from Bolívar's commitment to the classical association of virtue with public masculinity.…”
Section: Bolívar's Proposals In Comparative Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centrality of virtue to republican philosophy of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries has been widely analysed, and in recent decades feminist scholars have explored its gendered nature (Bloch 1987;Blum 1986;Zerilli 1994).1 Equally ubiquitous in the political texts of the period are references to the role of passions as the motivation of human action, and yet their significance and meaning has been much less studied (Hirschman 1997). A major concern of statesmen in Europe and the Americas during this revolutionary period was how to establish governments that could survive factionalism and would devolve neither into tyranny nor anarchy: controlling men's passions was seen as the key.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%