2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The General Factor of Personality, BIS–BAS, expectancies of reward and punishment, self-esteem, and positive and negative affect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some exceptions to this are the finding that the general factor is positively related to self-esteem and supervisor-rated job performance (Erdle, Irwing, Rushton, Park, 2010; van der Linden et al, 2010). Similar to Stability and Plasticity, the general factor has been linked with reinforcement sensitivity theory in an effort to provide a biological understanding of why individual differences in the construct exist (Erdle & Rushton, 2010). Much research remains as to whether these findings are merely measurement artifacts (Bäckström, Björklund, & Larsson, 2009; Erdle, Gosling, & Potter, 2009; McCrae et al, 2008), are extensively hindering theoretical development (Ferguson, Chamorro-Premuzic, Pickering, & Weiss, 2011), or are better represented by parsimonious blended traits instead of postulating higher-order factors (Ashton, Lee, Goldberg, & de Vries, 2009).…”
Section: Broad Bandwidthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some exceptions to this are the finding that the general factor is positively related to self-esteem and supervisor-rated job performance (Erdle, Irwing, Rushton, Park, 2010; van der Linden et al, 2010). Similar to Stability and Plasticity, the general factor has been linked with reinforcement sensitivity theory in an effort to provide a biological understanding of why individual differences in the construct exist (Erdle & Rushton, 2010). Much research remains as to whether these findings are merely measurement artifacts (Bäckström, Björklund, & Larsson, 2009; Erdle, Gosling, & Potter, 2009; McCrae et al, 2008), are extensively hindering theoretical development (Ferguson, Chamorro-Premuzic, Pickering, & Weiss, 2011), or are better represented by parsimonious blended traits instead of postulating higher-order factors (Ashton, Lee, Goldberg, & de Vries, 2009).…”
Section: Broad Bandwidthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even taking into account constriction of effect size due to measurement error, the current and previous findings suggest that social inhibition is a contributing but not the sole influence in the developing GFP. Cross‐sectional results from Erdle and Rushton () and from Van der Linden et al () suggest that social inhibition and the GFP share roughly 10% of their variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, in a direct test of the association between behavioural inhibition and the GFP, in two samples of college students, Erdle and Rushton () found the anticipated negative association between behavioural inhibition and the GFP. Van der Linden et al () found similar findings in two samples of children, one of which included a subsample of children with a clinically diagnosed anxiety disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, recent research suggests that the Behavioral Approach-Drive factor is related to engagement of risky behaviors such as gambling (O'Connor, Stewart, & Watt, 2009) and aggression (Seibert, et al, 2010). In addition, it is plausible that adolescents might engage in problem behaviors such as rule-breaking and aggressive behaviors because they experience rewarding feelings (Erdle & Rushton, 2010; Yan & Dillard, 2010) from such activities. Another important predictor of adolescent aggression is behavioral inhibition, as measured by Gray's BIS system (Vitaro, Brendgen, & Tremblay, 2002; Watson, Fischer, Andreas, & Smith, 2004).…”
Section: Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%