2005
DOI: 10.1177/0486613405280801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The General Rate of Profit in a New Market Economy: Conceptual Issues and Estimates

Abstract: Using national income data, we estimate levels and identify trends in the general rate of return in Russia from 1994 to 2002. Endogenous distributional and efficiency determinants of profitability are discussed in the Marxian analytical framework. We find that in spite of the major decline in output, the average rate of profit in Russia during the transition period was relatively high. This is primarily explained by the high level of the rate of surplus value (rate of exploitation), which was estimated to be 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our estimation of macroeconomic ROR is comparable to these in the literature. The majority of the crosscountry studies report highest average ROR to be found in less developed economies (Bigsten, 2000;Banerjee and Duflo, 2005;Izyumov and Alterman, 2005;Bai et al, 2006;Lu and Gao, 2009;Udry and Anagol, 2006;Chou et al, 2016). However our results differ from those reported in Caselli and Feyrer (2007) and some of the follow-up papers including Mello (2009) and Ferriera (2011).…”
Section: Figure2 Capital-weighted Ror By Country Typecontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Our estimation of macroeconomic ROR is comparable to these in the literature. The majority of the crosscountry studies report highest average ROR to be found in less developed economies (Bigsten, 2000;Banerjee and Duflo, 2005;Izyumov and Alterman, 2005;Bai et al, 2006;Lu and Gao, 2009;Udry and Anagol, 2006;Chou et al, 2016). However our results differ from those reported in Caselli and Feyrer (2007) and some of the follow-up papers including Mello (2009) and Ferriera (2011).…”
Section: Figure2 Capital-weighted Ror By Country Typecontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…(Source: Authors" calculations) Overall, capital profitability in LDC and TEC was higher than in HDC for all of its measures for most years. Our estimates of ROR generally match the results in the literature, where most cross-country studies reported ROR to be consistently higher in less developed economies (Bigsten, 2000;Banerjee and Duflo, 2005;Izyumov and Alterman, 2005;Bai et al, 2006;Lu and Gao, 2009;Udry and Anagol, 2006;Chou et al, 2016).…”
Section: Analytical Framework and Datasupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In developing economies, net capital inflows and fast growth of domestic investment should have increased competition amongst capital owners, implying a decline of returns to capital. However, most of the existing studies of capital profitability in less developed economies (Bigsten, 2000;Banerjee and Duflo, 2005;Izyumov and Alterman, 2005;Bai et al, 2006;Lu and Gao, 2009;Udry and Anagol, 2006;Marquetti et al, 2010;Jetin, 2012) report ROC there to be significantly higher than in developed countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%