1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80104-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
1,278
0
13

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,152 publications
(1,295 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
1,278
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…After excluding ambiguously aligned positions and gaps, the resulting alignment was subjected to Bayesian phylogenetic analysis with the software MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). The model chosen was GTR (Lanave et al 1984;Rodríguez et al 1990) with the number of invariable sites being estimated, and a gamma-shaped distribution of variable sites with four rate categories (GTR+G+I). Four chains were run up to 1,000,000 generations from a random starting tree well beyond convergence (the value of Ln L stabilised around -15000; PSRF parameter=1.006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After excluding ambiguously aligned positions and gaps, the resulting alignment was subjected to Bayesian phylogenetic analysis with the software MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). The model chosen was GTR (Lanave et al 1984;Rodríguez et al 1990) with the number of invariable sites being estimated, and a gamma-shaped distribution of variable sites with four rate categories (GTR+G+I). Four chains were run up to 1,000,000 generations from a random starting tree well beyond convergence (the value of Ln L stabilised around -15000; PSRF parameter=1.006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first 5000 trees were discarded as the burn in. In addition, a maximum likelihood analysis was carried out using the program TREEFINDER (Jobb et al 2004), applying a GTR+G+I model of nucleotide substitution (Rodríguez et al 1990). All necessary parameters were estimated from the data sets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses were performed with the software MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). The model chosen here was the GTR model of substitution (Lanave et al 1984;Rodriguez et al 1990), the number of invariable sites being estimated, and a gamma-shaped distribution of variable sites with five rate categories. The values of alpha and the proportions of invariable sites, were respectively, 0.467 and 0.269, for the general Tubulina tree, 0.170 and 0.816 for the short-branching arcellinids, and 0.744 and 0.705 for the ''core Nebelas'' tree.…”
Section: Apodera Vasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four simultaneous chains were run for 1,000,000 generations, and 10,000 trees were sampled, 50 of which were discarded as the burn-in. The model chosen here was the GTR model of substitution, with five rate categories (Lanave et al 1984;Rodriguez et al 1990), the number of invariable sites being estimated, and a gamma-shaped distribution of variable sites. Posterior probabilities at all nodes were estimated from the 9950 remaining trees.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%