2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2176609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The generalized active space concept for the relativistic treatment of electron correlation. III. Large-scale configuration interaction and multiconfiguration self-consistent-field four-component methods with application to UO2

Abstract: We present an implementation for large-scale relativistic electronic structure calculations including spin-dependent contributions and electron correlation in a fully variational procedure. The modular implementation of the double group configuration interaction ͑CI͒ program into a multiconfiguration self-consistent-field ͑MCSCF͒ code allows for the treatment of large CI expansions in both the spinor optimization step and the post-MCSCF dynamic electron correlation step. As an illustration of the potential of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Is this large discrepancy caused by the differences induced by the argon matrix, by deficiencies in the calculation, such as limits on the size of the active space used, or by both? The generalized active space configuration interaction ͑GASCI͒ results by Fleig et al 23 agree better with experiment and with older spin-orbit configuration interaction calculations of Chang 22 but both calculations were done in rather modest basis sets and could suffer from basis set incompleteness errors. It is therefore clear that more theoretical work is desirable.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Is this large discrepancy caused by the differences induced by the argon matrix, by deficiencies in the calculation, such as limits on the size of the active space used, or by both? The generalized active space configuration interaction ͑GASCI͒ results by Fleig et al 23 agree better with experiment and with older spin-orbit configuration interaction calculations of Chang 22 but both calculations were done in rather modest basis sets and could suffer from basis set incompleteness errors. It is therefore clear that more theoretical work is desirable.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…SOC is rather large, leading to significant admixture of 3 ⌬ u character in both the 2u ground state and the 3u first excited state ͑better described in a jj-coupling picture as pure 5f 5/2 1 7s 1/2 1 states͒. Actual calculations on gas phase UO 2 by Chang, 22 Gagliardi et al 4,18 and Fleig et al 23 reproduce this splitting well. The manifold of SOC-split grade states does not have two so closely spaced states at low energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(97) in the appendix) to match the partitioning of the wave function according to Eq. (26). We then obtain the following block structure for the two-fermion Hamiltonian defined in Eq.…”
Section: Exact Two-particle Kinetic-balance Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four-component methods rely on the kinetic-balance condition for variational stability. This condition is well-defined for single fermions [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and can therefore straightforwardly be applied to orbital-based methods such as the DiracHartree-Fock approach and electron-correlation methods based on it [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. For orbital-based theories with explicit correlation factors, recent work focused on four-component second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory with positiveenergy-states projection operators in combination with the one-electron kineticbalance condition [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%