2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(01)00188-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The generalized finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
376
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 569 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
376
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the noteworthy SGEMs are the s-version of the finite element method [19,20,21,22] with application to strong [23,24] and weak [25,26,27,28] discontinuities, various multigrid-like scale bridging methods [29,30,31,32], the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) [33,34,35] and the Generalized Finite Element Method (GFEM) [36,37] both based on the Partition of Unity (PU) framework [38,39] and the Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) [40,41] method. Multiscale methods based on the concurrent resolution of multiple scales are often called as embedded, concurrent, integrated or hand-shaking multiscale methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the noteworthy SGEMs are the s-version of the finite element method [19,20,21,22] with application to strong [23,24] and weak [25,26,27,28] discontinuities, various multigrid-like scale bridging methods [29,30,31,32], the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) [33,34,35] and the Generalized Finite Element Method (GFEM) [36,37] both based on the Partition of Unity (PU) framework [38,39] and the Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) [40,41] method. Multiscale methods based on the concurrent resolution of multiple scales are often called as embedded, concurrent, integrated or hand-shaking multiscale methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this discontinuous enrichment functions, the problem of linear dependency does not arise, but the issue of ensuring the integration errors to be significantly smaller than the approximation errors requires special attention [35]. In GFEM, which uses special handbook function [36,37], the resulting space is not linearly independent and the computational overhead (needed for either reorthogonalization or for using an indefinite solver) might be quite significant. Moreover, integration of coupling terms involving special handbook functions is challenging at best, and therefore it is not surprising that the method has been implemented for two dimensional problems only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, numerical techniques such as the extended finite element method (X-FEM) [17,18], generalized finite element method [23], or the element partition method [24] are all particular instances of the partition of unity method. In the X-FEM, the emphasis has been on modeling discontinuities (such as cracks) with minimal enrichment.…”
Section: Extended Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "Partition of Unity Method" (PUM) [32,3] uses a priori knowledge about the solution (discontinuities at interfaces) to obtain special PUM finite element spaces. In the "Generalized Finite Element Method" (GFEM) [48,46], the PUM and classical FEM basis functions are used together to improve the approximation. Starting from classical FEM and "enriching" the FE spaces by additional basis functions to incorporate discontinuities has been exploited with the "Extended Finite Element Methods" (XFEM) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%