1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)84183-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The generalized standard addition method: intermetallic interferences in anodic stripping voltammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early years of Chemometrics, Kowalski and coworkers [7][8][9] had already proposed a multivariate version of the standard addition method, called generalised standard addition method (GSAM), which was successfully applied to data obtained by UV-vis spectrophotometry [10], inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy [11,12] and anodic stripping voltammetry [13]. The method is based on the classical least-squares calibration (CLS) of a 'signal increase' matrix obtained by subtracting the spectra of the sample from the original data matrix containing all the spectra measured after successive additions of standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early years of Chemometrics, Kowalski and coworkers [7][8][9] had already proposed a multivariate version of the standard addition method, called generalised standard addition method (GSAM), which was successfully applied to data obtained by UV-vis spectrophotometry [10], inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy [11,12] and anodic stripping voltammetry [13]. The method is based on the classical least-squares calibration (CLS) of a 'signal increase' matrix obtained by subtracting the spectra of the sample from the original data matrix containing all the spectra measured after successive additions of standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other electrode materials are investigated in order to avoid the use of toxic mercury. Chemically modified electrodes (CME) are often applied to increase selectivity of metal ions determination [9,10]. The electrode surface can be modified by active species, which should selectively react with ions or other substances present in the electrolyte.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 To overcome this drawback, a generalized standard addition method (GSAM) was proposed by Saxberg and Kowalski 3 , and has been applied to spectrophotometry [4][5][6] , inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) [7][8][9] , flame photometry 10 , graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry 11 , stripping voltammetry 12 and potentiometric stripping analysis. 13 In spite of the fact that GSAM allows the correcting of matrix effects and spectral interferences in multicomponent analysis [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] , it is slow and laborious when carried out by manual procedures. 4,7,[11][12][13] This drawback has been surpassed using automated procedures 5,6,[8][9][10] to implement GSAM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In spite of the fact that GSAM allows the correcting of matrix effects and spectral interferences in multicomponent analysis [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] , it is slow and laborious when carried out by manual procedures. 4,7,[11][12][13] This drawback has been surpassed using automated procedures 5,6,[8][9][10] to implement GSAM. The first automated system for GSAM implementation was proposed by Kalivas and Kowalski 5 and applied to spectrophotometric determinations of nickel, cobalt and copper in synthetic samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%