2008
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.088880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Generation and Maintenance of Genetic Variation by Frequency-Dependent Selection: Constructing Polymorphisms Under the Pairwise Interaction Model

Abstract: Frequency-dependent selection remains the most commonly invoked heuristic explanation for the maintenance of genetic variation. For polymorphism to exist, new alleles must be both generated and maintained in the population. Here we use a construction approach to model frequency-dependent selection with mutation under the pairwise interaction model. The pairwise interaction model is a general model of frequency-dependent selection at the genotypic level. We find that frequency-dependent selection is able to gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequency-dependent selection has been recognized as one of the most common explanations for the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms [43,44]. This frequency dependence may not only affect morph-specific fitness [29,30] but also the phenotype [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency-dependent selection has been recognized as one of the most common explanations for the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms [43,44]. This frequency dependence may not only affect morph-specific fitness [29,30] but also the phenotype [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know from the general construction PIM for FDS (Trotter and Spencer 2008) that the impacts, the w ij,km , greatly affect the likelihood of allele A m successfully invading the polymorphism. A mutant allele that leads to low values of w ij,km will drag down the fitnesses of existing alleles, thereby improving its own chances of invading the polymorphism.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each mutant interaction fitness (w km,ij ) is a function of the existing interaction fitness (w kp,ij ) of the corresponding parental genotype (A k A p ) and is given by a kp,ij w kp,ij , where each a is drawn from a rescaled beta-distribution on [0, 1.5] with m a ¼ 0:95; s In this case, as in case 1, both homozygote and heterozygote mutant fitnesses are functions of the existing interaction fitness (w kp,ij ) of the corresponding parental genotype (A k A p ) and are given by a kp,ij w kp,ij , where each a is drawn from a rescaled beta-distribution on [0, 1.5] with m a ¼ 0:95; s 2 a ¼ 0:001. We know from the general construction PIM for FDS (Trotter and Spencer 2008) that the impacts, the w ij,km , greatly affect the likelihood of allele A m successfully invading the polymorphism. A mutant allele that leads to low values of w ij,km will drag down the fitnesses of existing alleles, thereby improving its own chances of invading the polymorphism.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations