2002
DOI: 10.1177/0952872002012001560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The generational conflict reconsidered

Abstract: The eclipse of the 20th century appears to coincide with the waning of the old industrial class divide. It remains an open question whether an alternative class-based stratification system is evolving but, in the meantime, both sociologists and economists have begun to identify new cleavage patterns. One which has sparked considerable attention is the possibility that chronos will become a battleground of conflicting interests (Preston, Summary The deteriorating trend in the incomes of families with young chil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…tencia de pautas demográficas de fecundidad reducida con formas familiares tradicionales en Europa del sur (Zuanna y Micheli, 2004), los investigadores han resaltado la debilidad del Estado de bienestar y la importancia de la solidaridad familiar como red de protección social (Esping-Andersen y Sarasa, 2002;Moreno Mínguez, 2007); la elevada temporalidad y desempleo de los jóvenes (Ahn y Mira, 2001;González y Jurado, 2006), así como el inflexible e inaccesible mercado de la vivienda (Kohler et al, 2006). También se ha señalado como posible causa interviniente en este hecho la desigualdad existente en las relaciones de género en el ámbito privado familiar, que no se corresponde con las expectativas de igualdad generadas en el ámbito público (McDonald, 2000).…”
Section: Marco Teórico Explicando El Declive De La Fecundidad En Un unclassified
“…tencia de pautas demográficas de fecundidad reducida con formas familiares tradicionales en Europa del sur (Zuanna y Micheli, 2004), los investigadores han resaltado la debilidad del Estado de bienestar y la importancia de la solidaridad familiar como red de protección social (Esping-Andersen y Sarasa, 2002;Moreno Mínguez, 2007); la elevada temporalidad y desempleo de los jóvenes (Ahn y Mira, 2001;González y Jurado, 2006), así como el inflexible e inaccesible mercado de la vivienda (Kohler et al, 2006). También se ha señalado como posible causa interviniente en este hecho la desigualdad existente en las relaciones de género en el ámbito privado familiar, que no se corresponde con las expectativas de igualdad generadas en el ámbito público (McDonald, 2000).…”
Section: Marco Teórico Explicando El Declive De La Fecundidad En Un unclassified
“…In sharp contrast, children today are about seven times more likely to have all four grandparents living than was the case in 1900 (Uhlenberg 1996;Hagestad and Uhlenberg 2007). Recent discussions of widening inequalities among children (Esping-Andersen and Sarasa 2002;Sørensen 2005) make it clear that we must map children's kin resources and seek to understand how intergenerational ties, especially to grandparents, contribute to children's social and cultural capital (Hagestad 2008b). Comprehensive studies of the availability and contributions of grandparents to boys and girls are needed, especially in countries with strongly imbalanced sex ratios in the older population.…”
Section: The Generational Structures Of Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this, it might be expected that, as well as a shift in total expenditure from children to the retired due to demography, there would also be a shift in expenditure from children to the retired in order to maintain their living standards in retirement. Esping-Andersen and Sarasa (2002) have expressed anxiety that population ageing might impose pressures on governments to maintain high spending on the retired at the expense of children and have argued on the basis of welfare regime types that the bias in favour of the aged is especially pronounced in Southern European welfare states while Scandinavian welfare states are more youth biased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%