The Structure of Protoplasm matter is very probably due to a specific arrangement of parts, that is to say, to structure. Often I am asked by physicists and chemists if much can be hoped for in the way of an understanding of protoplasmic structure. Direct observation, even with the highest powers of the microscope, is too superficial to reveal anything fundamental. Chemical analysis is not productive of significant results because once protoplasm is subjected to severe treatment it is no longer living matter. The very structural features which distinguish it from the nonliving are then destroyed. The biologist interprets the basic structure of protoplasm somewhat in the same way that a chemist interprets the structure of a compound, namely, by its behavior. The chemist sees nothing of the links, rings, side chains, amino and carboxyl groups which he attaches here and there, yet he builds up a structure with considerable confidence, which is the justification of stereochemistry. Just so does the biologist work; he interprets the structure of living matter in the light of its known physical properties. But this was not the method of the older biologists, and herein lay their error. They told only of what they saw. Protoplasm viewed through the microscope appears to be a suspension of fine granules. On this fact was based the granular hypothesis of protoplasmic structure. Its weakness lay in the diversity of the granules and the undue significance given them. Some are admittedly important, as are the plastids and the mitochondria; others, such as fat droplets, are but reserve food. These last are really not granules at all but liquid droplets which make of cytoplasm a fine emulsion. The importance attributed to the "granules"-they were regarded by some as living units, morphologically and physiologically independent of the cell-and the necessary coarseness of any optically visible structure, led to the discarding of the granular hypothesis. The belief that the basic structural unit of protoplasm is a spherical body has long persisted and has given rise to numerous hypotheses expressed in terms of granules, globules, alveoli, and micellae. Such suggestions are in part supported by fact. Thus, protoplasm is unquestionably an emulsion, and when the emulsion globules are under pressure and symmetrically arranged they assume the shape of dodecaor tetrakaidecahedra which are hexagonal in cross section. These latter are alveoli.