2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.18.562802
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genetic evolution of acral melanoma

Meng Wang,
Satoshi Fukushima,
Yi-Shuan Sheen
et al.

Abstract: Acral melanoma is an aggressive type of melanoma with unknown origins, arising on the sole, palm, or nail apparatus. It is the most common type of melanoma in individuals with dark skin and is notoriously challenging to treat. Our study examined exome sequencing data from 139 tissue samples, spanning different progression stages, collected from 37 patients. We found that 78.4% of the melanomas displayed one or more clustered copy number transitions with focal amplifications, recurring predominantly on chromoso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparatively, while CM suffers both the intrinsic effects of decreased cell proliferation and extrinsic effects of decreased vascularization with Lenvatinib, it appears less sensitive to the extrinsic effects and is capable of overcoming the intrinsic barriers to growth (Figure 6F). The amplification of genes in the FGF/FGFR/CRKL/GAB2 signaling axis in AM has previously been described 6,19,65 , and our work presents the first attempt to drug this pathway in preclinical models. The therapeutic efficacy of Lenvatinib across all tested AM models reveals an important observation: amplification of genes in the FGF signaling pathway is not a pre-requisite for Lenvatinib sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comparatively, while CM suffers both the intrinsic effects of decreased cell proliferation and extrinsic effects of decreased vascularization with Lenvatinib, it appears less sensitive to the extrinsic effects and is capable of overcoming the intrinsic barriers to growth (Figure 6F). The amplification of genes in the FGF/FGFR/CRKL/GAB2 signaling axis in AM has previously been described 6,19,65 , and our work presents the first attempt to drug this pathway in preclinical models. The therapeutic efficacy of Lenvatinib across all tested AM models reveals an important observation: amplification of genes in the FGF signaling pathway is not a pre-requisite for Lenvatinib sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…These include highly amplified genes (≥8 copy number) at loci previously observed to be impacted by tyfonas/hailstorm events 18,19 in 7/11 (64%) of AM compared to only one CM tumor (17%).…”
Section: Characterization Of Am Patient-derived Xenograft (Pdx) Mouse...mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among different melanoma subtypes, acral melanoma (AM) is the most frequent in non-white populations, including Asians and Africans, and is responsible for the higher proportion of cases in countries with a lower incidence of melanoma overall [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. AM differs from the other melanoma forms in the biological profile causing specific genetic/immunohistochemical features and related behaviors [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]: first, it is a non-UV-related tumor arising from the epithelium-associated melanocytes; second, it shows the early onset of major chromosomal rearrangements with gene copy number changes and multiple high-level amplifications (e.g., driver mutations in GNAQ, NF1, KIT TP53, PTEN, or RB1 genes, versus BRAF and NRAS of superficial spreading and nodular melanoma) [ 13 ]; third, it exhibits specific molecular findings (e.g., CCND1 overexpression , AURKA , and TERT) [ 14 ]; fourth, it is characterized by a rapid evolution and ability to metastasize and, thus, a poor prognosis [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. This said, AM is also known for having a late diagnosis compared with other forms: the more reported underlying hypothesis emphasize the patients’ (and/or physicians’) reticence in examining this area and the difficulty of the differential diagnosis with acral nevi -with reported rates of misdiagnosis of 20%—despite dermoscopic examination [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%