The Eastern Cape redfin, Pseudobarbus
afer, has long been considered to be a single widespread and variable species occurring in multiple isolated river systems in the Cape Fold Ecoregion (CFE) at the southern tip of Africa. Mitochondrial cytochrome b and control region sequence data of individuals from populations currently assigned to Pseudobarbus
afer across the species’ distribution range revealed existence of four deeply divergent taxonomic units: (i) the Mandela lineage confined to the Sundays, Swartkops and Baakens river systems, (ii) the Krom lineage endemic to the Krom River system, (iii) the St Francis lineage occurring in the Gamtoos and adjacent river systems, and (iv) the Forest lineage occurring in several coastal river systems from the Tsitsikamma to the Klein Brak River system. The Forest lineage is closely related to Pseudobarbus
phlegethon from the Olifants River system on the west coast of South Africa, suggesting that it does not belong to Pseudobarbus
afer s.l. Herein we focus on the three lineages within the Pseudobarbus
afer s.l. complex and provide new diagnosis for Pseudobarbus
afer s.s (Mandela lineage), revalidate Pseudobarbus
senticeps (Krom lineage) as a distinct species, and describe a new species Pseudobarbus
swartzi (St Francis lineage). The three species exhibit subtle differences, which explains why they were previously considered to represent a single variable and widespread species. Pseudobarbus
senticeps differs from both Pseudobarbus
afer and Pseudobarbus
swartzi by having fewer (i.e. larger) scales (25–33, mode 29 lateral line scale series; 10–12, mode 11 circumpeduncular scales) and presence of a lateral stripe which terminates in a conspicuous triangular blotch at the base of the caudal fin. Long barbels which reach or surpass the vertical through the posterior edge of the eye further separate Pseudobarbus
senticeps from Pseudobarbus
afer s.s. which possesses simple short barbels which do not reach the vertical through the posterior margin of the eye. Pseudobarbus
afer s.s differs from Pseudobarbus
swartzi
sp. n. by possession of fewer scale rows along the lateral line (29–35, mode 32 vs 34–37, mode 36 in Pseudobarbus
swartzi), fewer scales around the caudal peduncle (12–16, mode 12 vs 13–17, mode 16 in Pseudobarbus
swartzi) and a distinct mesh or net-like pigmentation pattern on latero-ventral scales.