The Genetic Legacy of the Expansion of Turkic-Speaking Nomads across Eurasia

Abstract

The Turkic peoples represent a diverse collection of ethnic groups defined by the Turkic languages. These groups have dispersed across a vast area, including Siberia, Northwest China, Central Asia, East Europe, the Caucasus, Anatolia, the Middle East, and Afghanistan. The origin and early dispersal history of the Turkic peoples is disputed, with candidates for their ancient homeland ranging from the Transcaspian steppe to Manchuria in Northeast Asia. Previous genetic studies have not identified a clear-cut unifying genetic signal for the Turkic peoples, which lends support for language replacement rather than demic diffusion as the model for the Turkic language’s expansion. We addressed the genetic origin of 373 individuals from 22 Turkic-speaking populations, representing their current geographic range, by analyzing genome-wide high-density genotype data. In agreement with the elite dominance model of language expansion most of the Turkic peoples studied genetically resemble their geographic neighbors. However, western Turkic peoples sampled across West Eurasia shared an excess of long chromosomal tracts that are identical by descent (IBD) with populations from present-day South Siberia and Mongolia (SSM), an area where historians center a series of early Turkic and non-Turkic steppe polities. While SSM matching IBD tracts (> 1cM) are also observed in non-Turkic populations, Turkic peoples demonstrate a higher percentage of such tracts (p-values ≤ 0.01) compared to their non-Turkic neighbors. Finally, we used the ALDER method and inferred admixture dates (~9th–17th centuries) that overlap with the Turkic migrations of the 5th–16th centuries. Thus, our results indicate historical admixture among Turkic peoples, and the recent shared ancestry with modern populations in SSM supports one of the hypothesized homelands for their nomadic Turkic and related Mongolic ancestors.

The genomic impact of European colonization of the Americas

“…To minimize the impact of within-source ("donors") genetic heterogeneity in the ancestry characterization process, we grouped the assembled 6,115 individuals ( Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Table 1A- Our fineSTRUCTURE results ( Supplementary Figure 2, Supplementary Table 2) confirm the worldwide genetic variation pattern already observed by previous studies at the continental scale [19][20][21][22][23] .…”

“…We assembled 11,15,16,20,21,23,25,32, We used KING to remove one random individual from pairs with kinship parameter higher than 0.0884 71 . The final dataset was therefore composed of 17,722 individuals from 261 populations 11,15,16,20,21,23,25,32, (Supplementary Table 1A-B, Supplementary Figure 1). Of these, 11,607 individuals belonging to 22 admixed American populations were treated as 'recipients', while the remaining 6,115 samples from 239 source populations were considered 'donors'.…”

A genetic chronology for the Indian Subcontinent points to heavily sex-biased dispersals

“…Pakistani populations occupy an intermediate position, particularly close to the currently Turkic-speaking peoples of Central Asia (the Turkmens, the Nogais and the Uzbeks) and the Indo-Iranian-speaking Tajiks in PC1 (which accounts for 59.3% of the variation). Genetically, Turkic-speaking groups resemble their geographic neighbours, indicating deep local ancestry and recent language shift [79]. …”

Genetic insights into the social organisation of the Avar period elite in the 7thcentury AD Carpathian Basin

“…The maternal genetic lineages of the Avar individuals were further investigated through the Neighbour Joining clustering method (NJ). We separately counted and constructed phylogenetic trees of the 16 mtDNA haplogroups detected (see Table S6 38 . The Buryats certainly represent a population that did not migrate much in the last millennia; therefore, they can be a good proxy for the Medieval population of South Siberia.…”