2013
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-11-79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genetics of infectious disease susceptibility: has the evidence for epistasis been overestimated?

Abstract: Interactions amongst genes, known as epistasis, are assumed to make a substantial contribution to the genetic variation in infectious disease susceptibility, but this claim is controversial. Here, we focus on the debate surrounding the evolutionary importance of interactions between resistance loci and argue that its role in explaining overall variance in disease outcomes may have been overestimated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence and role of epistasis in human disease has been difficult to demonstrate and remains highly controversial since it was first proposed over one hundred years ago. 14, 31, 32 The predominant difficulty has been the inability to undertake relevant clinical and in vitro functional studies to quantify the consequences of multiple genetic mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence and role of epistasis in human disease has been difficult to demonstrate and remains highly controversial since it was first proposed over one hundred years ago. 14, 31, 32 The predominant difficulty has been the inability to undertake relevant clinical and in vitro functional studies to quantify the consequences of multiple genetic mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some experiments, B cells were labelled with division-tracking dye cell trace violet (CTV, Invitrogen). 32 For phenotypic and functional analysis, cells were cultured in 96-well plates for 5 or 6 days, collected, stained with CD20, CD27, CD38, IgG, IgM, IgA and the proportion of isotype switched and differentiated antibody secreting cells determined as previously described. 6 Secreted IgM, IgG and IgA levels were determined by Ig Heavy chain-specific immunoassays as previously described.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of these traits, there was little evidence for QTL hotspots (Breitling et al, ), arising from either tight linkage or pleiotropy, except for QTL at the end of linkage group 10 that contributed to body size, castration, fecundity and lifespan (Figure ). Epistasis effect sizes were also comparatively low, further reinforcing the largely independent effects of the qualitative and qualitative alleles underlying each metric of susceptibility—but see Hall and Ebert () for why this is more a reflection of the genotypes used for the QTL panel, rather than a true assessment of additive versus epistatic variance in a population; and see also Metzger et al () and Bento et al ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Epistasis effect sizes were also comparatively low, further reinforcing the largely independent effects of the qualitative and qualitative alleles underlying each metric of susceptibility-but see Hall and Ebert (2013) for why this is more a reflection of the genotypes used for the QTL panel, rather than a true assessment of additive versus epistatic variance in a population; and see also Metzger et al (2016) and Bento et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In parasites, this tendency relates to high mutation rates and population sizes [4,47,48], as well as elevated gene redundancy and ploidy [43]. In hosts and vectors, the effect likely arises from prevalent polygenic, epistatic and pleiotropic control of interaction traits [49,50]. Simulations show how quickly differentiation-based methods lose power to detect adaptive change as selection intensity weakens, reaching complete impotence at levels still easily managed by correlative alternatives [51].…”
Section: What Makes Landscape Genomics Such a Powerful Tool To Study mentioning
confidence: 99%