1934
DOI: 10.1007/bf02982198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genetics of the rumpless fowl with evidence of a case of changing dominance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

1936
1936
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We are aware of objections to Fisher's hypothesis for the evolution of dominance in the context of natural populations, but we speculate that these objections do not apply to maize populations in which stringent artificial selection has been practiced. The modification, by selection, of the level or direction of dominance has been shown in Drosophila (Helfer 1939), poultry (Dunn and Landauer 1934), cotton (Gossypium spp., Harland 1936) and different moth species (Ford 1940;Kettlewell 1965). On the other hand, we note that true overdominance for grain yield in maize contradicts the results of Duvick (1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We are aware of objections to Fisher's hypothesis for the evolution of dominance in the context of natural populations, but we speculate that these objections do not apply to maize populations in which stringent artificial selection has been practiced. The modification, by selection, of the level or direction of dominance has been shown in Drosophila (Helfer 1939), poultry (Dunn and Landauer 1934), cotton (Gossypium spp., Harland 1936) and different moth species (Ford 1940;Kettlewell 1965). On the other hand, we note that true overdominance for grain yield in maize contradicts the results of Duvick (1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The haplotype is present in the heterozygous or homozygous state in rumpless birds. All 7 birds with partial tails are heterozygous for the rumpless haplotype and likely represent the intermediate phenotype described by Dunn and Landauer [3]. Because rumpless is dominant and fully penetrant, we further delimited the critical interval by identifying regions of the haplotype shared by tailed birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rumpless phenotype is characterized by the absence of all free caudal vertebrae and the uropygial gland [3] . Without underlying skeletal support, birds with caudal truncation lack a fleshy rump and tail feathers [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iroquois genes are tied to Notch, Wnt, and Bmp/Shh signaling [ 146 - 148 ], and in addition to their proneural role, they establish tissue borders during development. Interestingly, heterozygotes of the rumpless locus retain 2 to 4 caudal vertebrae, and these are irregularly fused (Figure 8 B) [ 149 , 150 ], adding this mutation to those that cause both short tails and fused vertebrae. The most caudal somites are never generated and the pygostyle, therefore, never forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%