2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Genomic Impact of European Colonization of the Americas

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
7
68
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the broader Latin American context, Harris et al (2018) inferred that current Peruvian mestizos (who are predominantly Pioneering mitochondrial DNA studies of the first decade of this century showed how African Bantu-associated haplotypes were more frequent in South America than in Central-and North-America (Gonçalves et al, 2008;Hünemeier et al, 2007;Salas et al, 2004). Our current studies with genome-wide data, by continuing to map the roots of the African Diaspora, allow for finer geographic inferences and estimates of genome-wide admixture proportions from the different African regions, adding new layers of knowledge to our understanding of the African Diaspora (Chacón-Duque et al, 2018;Fortes-Lima et al, 2017;Gouveia et al, 2020;Ongaro et al, 2019). (Ribeiro, 1995).…”
Section: New Trendsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the broader Latin American context, Harris et al (2018) inferred that current Peruvian mestizos (who are predominantly Pioneering mitochondrial DNA studies of the first decade of this century showed how African Bantu-associated haplotypes were more frequent in South America than in Central-and North-America (Gonçalves et al, 2008;Hünemeier et al, 2007;Salas et al, 2004). Our current studies with genome-wide data, by continuing to map the roots of the African Diaspora, allow for finer geographic inferences and estimates of genome-wide admixture proportions from the different African regions, adding new layers of knowledge to our understanding of the African Diaspora (Chacón-Duque et al, 2018;Fortes-Lima et al, 2017;Gouveia et al, 2020;Ongaro et al, 2019). (Ribeiro, 1995).…”
Section: New Trendsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Present-day populations living in the Americas trace their ancestry to Indigenous groups, together with influxes from multiple sources from Africa and Eurasia, due to a complex history of admixture following the Atlantic Slave Trade, the Colonial Era, and more recent migration phenomena [1]. In the last decade, a substantial number of genomic surveys of American populations highlighted the extreme heterogeneity in the continents, also reflecting the diverse demographic history of different areas [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spanish immigrants moved to this geographic region to establish the first mining towns (Beezley, 2011) and, in the process, contributed their paternal lineages to local Native Mexican communities. The scarcity of female migrants (6%) (Ongaro et al, 2019) further stimulated gene flow between Spanish men and Native Mexican women, reducing the representation of indigenous paternal lineages in these communities but allowing them to maintain their indigenous languages. This admixture process could have occurred primarily in those communities located near the Pachuca-Real del Monte corridor (Saavedra-Silva and Sanchez-Salazar, 2008), and then extended to nearby towns (i.e., Ixmiquilpan).…”
Section: Impact Of European Admixture In Native Mexican Population From Hidalgomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some Nahua R1b haplotypes showed some genetic dissimilarity from others coming from Spain. These haplotypes could have been brought more recently (during the 19 th century), when mining economic activity was opened to other foreign investment from England, France, Germany, Italy, and North America (Ongaro et al, 2019;Saavedra-Silva and Sanchez-Salazar, 2008).…”
Section: Impact Of European Admixture In Native Mexican Population From Hidalgomentioning
confidence: 99%