2016
DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genus Cyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) in Europe

Abstract: Kraj ı cek, M., Fott, J., Miracle, M.R., Ventura, M., Sommaruga, R., Kirschner, P., Cern y, M. (2015). The genus Cyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) in Europe. -Zoologica Scripta, 45, 671-682. Although copepods of the genus Cyclops are among the most common and dominant plankton taxa of lakes in the northern temperate zone, their taxonomy is still unclear. We analysed an extensive array of Cyclops populations from Europe by means of molecular methods and evaluated morphological characters. Altogether, 68 populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
21
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the 1980s, it has become standard in copepod taxonomy to include the “microcharacters” (spinule ornamentation of the limbs, seta setulation, integumental pore signature) along with the classic gross characters (limb segmentation, body proportions). Interestingly, these fine structures frequently show less intraspecific variation than the morphometric characters and correlate well with other (gross) morphological features, molecular markers and the presence of reproductive isolation (Baribwegure & Dumont, ; Fiers & Van de Velde, ; Karaytug, ; Krajíček et al, ; Van de Velde, ). The utility of some surface ornamentation characters for species diagnoses has been explored in the genus Cyclops as well (Einsle, ; Hołyńska, ; Hołyńska & Dahms, ; Hołyńska & Dimante‐Deimantovica, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since the 1980s, it has become standard in copepod taxonomy to include the “microcharacters” (spinule ornamentation of the limbs, seta setulation, integumental pore signature) along with the classic gross characters (limb segmentation, body proportions). Interestingly, these fine structures frequently show less intraspecific variation than the morphometric characters and correlate well with other (gross) morphological features, molecular markers and the presence of reproductive isolation (Baribwegure & Dumont, ; Fiers & Van de Velde, ; Karaytug, ; Krajíček et al, ; Van de Velde, ). The utility of some surface ornamentation characters for species diagnoses has been explored in the genus Cyclops as well (Einsle, ; Hołyńska, ; Hołyńska & Dahms, ; Hołyńska & Dimante‐Deimantovica, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Y, ” C. mauritaniae , C. divergens , C. bohater and C. lacustris (Table , Figures , a, b) , and also support sister relationships between the divergens ‐ and abyssorum ‐clade. The “unscaled” trees show the divergens ‐group paraphyletic and C. lacustris and C. bohater as basal offshoots of the genus (Supporting information Figure ), yet such a topology is not supported by either the “unordered” and “scaled” reconstructions, nor the phylogeny inferred from molecular characters (Krajíček et al, ). The divergens ‐clade is characterized by the occurrence of the 7‐setae state on the second endopodal segment of the antenna in the male (with the exception of C. lacustris in which 8 setae are present), and the pilose medial expansion of the P4 basipodite (fixed in Cyclops sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations