2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geochemistry and geochronology of the Xiarihamu II mafic–ultramafic complex, Eastern Kunlun, Qinghai Province, China: Implications for the genesis of magmatic Ni–Cu sulfide deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is similar to the previously discovered AkechukesaiⅠand Xiarihamu mafic-ultramafic complexes in terms of petrological features and metallic mineral assemblage [unpublished data]. The Xiarihamu deposit, one of the largest and best-known magmatic Ni-Cu deposits in this region [6,10,11], was the first Ni-Cu deposit discovered in the EKOB, and formed between late Silurian and Early Devonian (424-406 Ma) [6,7,11]. The discovery of this deposit stimulated more interest in evaluating the potential of the Cu-Ni mineralization in this region.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is similar to the previously discovered AkechukesaiⅠand Xiarihamu mafic-ultramafic complexes in terms of petrological features and metallic mineral assemblage [unpublished data]. The Xiarihamu deposit, one of the largest and best-known magmatic Ni-Cu deposits in this region [6,10,11], was the first Ni-Cu deposit discovered in the EKOB, and formed between late Silurian and Early Devonian (424-406 Ma) [6,7,11]. The discovery of this deposit stimulated more interest in evaluating the potential of the Cu-Ni mineralization in this region.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The partitioning of sulfur between different S-bearing phases during mantle melting generates a strongly heterogeneous distribution of bulk sulfur concentrations in the resultant melt as well as variations in the 34 S composition of the metasomatized mantle source [38]. Addition of S is often linked to the generation of magmatic sulphide mineralization as the addition of significant amounts of S may be more conducive to sulfur saturation of the magma [7]. The Akechukesai IV mafic-ultramafic complex has δ 34 S values (5.0% -13.4% ) that are higher than the expected value for the mantle (0% ± 2% ), suggesting the complex contains additional S, most likely derived from subducted oceanic crustal material.…”
Section: Crustal and Source Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The intermediate-acid rocks include granodiorite, monzogranite, granite porphyry, and quartz diorite [6,30,31], and the basic-ultrabasic rocks are gabbro, olivine websterite, and lherzolite. The Ni-Cu mineralization is related to ultramafic rocks [7,8,32,33], and the porphyry, porphyry-skarn, and skarn-type deposits are mostly related to the Triassic granites [17][18][19].…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%