2007
DOI: 10.1144/sp291.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geodynamics of the Aegean and Anatolia: introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
4
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Squeezed between the converging African and Eurasian plates, the Eastern Mediterranean region is an area of active geodynamics where ongoing crustal deformation and high seismicity result from complex interactions between competing forces (Taymaz et al, 2007). Since the Late Cretaceous closure of the Neotethyan basins, its evolution is governed by northward subduction of the African plate along the Hellenic trench in the west and continental collision between Arabia and Turkey in the east (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Squeezed between the converging African and Eurasian plates, the Eastern Mediterranean region is an area of active geodynamics where ongoing crustal deformation and high seismicity result from complex interactions between competing forces (Taymaz et al, 2007). Since the Late Cretaceous closure of the Neotethyan basins, its evolution is governed by northward subduction of the African plate along the Hellenic trench in the west and continental collision between Arabia and Turkey in the east (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Northward motion of the Arabian indenter led to the formation of the Caucasus orogen and caused extrusion of the Anatolian microplate, whose westward escape, accompanied by counter-clockwise rotation, is guided by the North and East Anatolian strike-slip faults. In the same time, in response to slab retreat and, possibly, post-orogenic collapse (Taymaz et al, 2007, and references therein), extension dominated much of the Cenozoic evolution in the Aegean Sea and western Turkey and is still prevailing in the whole area, from the Corinth rift (Bell et al, 2009;Floyd et al, 2010) to the horsts and grabens of western Turkey (Çiftçi and Bozkurt, 2009;Kurtuluş et al, 2009;Süzen et al, 2006). GPS velocities (Reilinger et al, 2006) show that back-arc extension in the Aegean is currently more rapid than the westward motion of Anatolia, thus accommodating the latter's displacement and still allowing local graben formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fault trace of the E-W-trending NAF is divided into two branches around Düzce city towards the north-west of Turkey (Özalp, Emre, & Doğan, 2013;Şengör & Barka, 1992). The northern branch, which generated İzmit (M w : 7.4) and Düzce (M w : 7.2) earthquakes in 1999 (Taymaz, Yılmaz, & Dilek, 2007), passes through the SapancaKocaeli corridor and enters into the Marmara Sea. The southern branch, which generated the Yenice (M w : 7.2) (McKenzie, 1972) and Manyas (M S : 6.8) (Taymaz, Jackson, & Mc Kenzie, 1991) earthquakes in 1953and 1964, is represented by many parallel/subparallel dextral strike slip faults that lie between the İznik and Aegean Sea along the Southern Marmara Region (SMR).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The northward motion of the Arabian plate relative to Eurasia causes lateral movement and rotation of this Anatolian plate. While the southern Aegean Sea is moving southwest, much of the Anatolian region is moving westward relative to Eurasia along two fault zones: the east and the north Anatolian fault zones into the Aegean domain [Armijo et al, 1999;Taymaz et al, 2007]. These strike-slip zones determine the boundaries of the Aegean-Anatolian microplate that is moving west-southwestwards overriding the subducting oceanic lithosphere of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea [Kocyigit and Deveci, 2007].…”
Section: Seismotectonic Of the Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%