The Geoengine: Geoengineering and the Geopolitics of Planetary Modification

Abstract

Abstract.As an introduction to a theme issue on the politics and practices of geoengineering, this paper outlines a framework for thinking about the 'geoengine' that underpins concepts of planetary modi fication. It reviews some of the ways in which geoengineering has been framed as a technological, governance, and promissory discourse and examines the contradictions inherent within some of these framings. Questioning some of the motivations and forms of participation that are evident in the governance of geoengineering, and its current challenge to existing forms of global democracy, the paper speculates on the wider geopolitical implications of operating at the scale of the planet, and what this means for how we currently understand the 'geo' in geopolitics. While there is a big mismatch between the restricted decision-making processes around geoengineering and the potential scope and impact of those decisions, there are also opportunities for geographers to make incisive contributions to this debate to change what geoengineering is and becomes as a material-discursive practice. This paper suggests that only by attending to the geo-ontological formations inherent in the fabrication of an engineerable earth, can a new geopolitics be accommodated within political thought that takes account of a much more active 'geoengine' that is being opened to political and material modification.

Society and Geomorphology: Addressing the (Mis-)Use of Aggregate Resources

“…Two key concepts are prominent viz. 'vertical geopolitics' (Elden 2013;Bridge 2013), meaning that the third dimension has to be added to the 'flat earth' territorial thinking by addressing volumes (including the atmosphere and subsurface underground), and 'geologic politics' (Clark 2013;Dalby 2015;Yusoff 2013), i.e. arguing for a geophysical/geological turn in political geography.…”

(In)secure environments and the domination of nature: introduction to themed section

“…Dalby 2014a 2015; also Zalasiewicz et al . 2010 2011) would arguably bring with them much the same entanglement of security and insecurity as promised by the Nazi sun gun, creating security for a few in a handful of places but heightening insecurity for countless others elsewhere (Dalby ; Yusoff ).…”

Geoengineering at the “Edge of the World”: Exploring perceptions of ocean fertilisation through the Haida Salmon Restoration Corporation

“…Moreover, it embroiled a diverse set of actors, including, through the Haida Nation, indigenous people who have been largely excluded from previous public consultation on geoengineering (Whyte, ). The HSRC therefore presents a novel contribution to social research on geoengineering that offers a new empirical perspective through pursuing a more situated engagement with geoengineering that is more closely in keeping with geographical research traditions (see also Jasanoff, ; Yusoff, ). It does this while “opening up” (cf.…”