1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01115091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geography of corporate production: Urban, industrial, and organizational systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking for relationships and relational mechanisms between the two approaches appears to be an interesting exercise as both concepts offer an alternative to economic analysis focused on the national economy. The impact of the firm location and urban systems is performed from both directions [36]: not only are urban systems shaped by the spatial choices of MNCs, but urban systems also influence the spatial distribution of corporations by their size, functions, and position in hierarchy [44,45]. The notions such as 'global cities' as well as 'global value networks' emerged because of the critique of research and modelling methodologies applied in social sciences that were primarily focused on countries with the intention to provide an alternative to this approach.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking for relationships and relational mechanisms between the two approaches appears to be an interesting exercise as both concepts offer an alternative to economic analysis focused on the national economy. The impact of the firm location and urban systems is performed from both directions [36]: not only are urban systems shaped by the spatial choices of MNCs, but urban systems also influence the spatial distribution of corporations by their size, functions, and position in hierarchy [44,45]. The notions such as 'global cities' as well as 'global value networks' emerged because of the critique of research and modelling methodologies applied in social sciences that were primarily focused on countries with the intention to provide an alternative to this approach.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has pinpointed several acquisition costs in terms of SEW losses to the family. These costs include weakening of family control (Zellweger et al, 2012), disruption of established social networks (Bergh & Gibbons, 2011;Friedland et al, 1990), and image and reputational losses (Deephouse & Jaskiewicz, 2013). On the other hand, firms pursue international acquisitions to create synergy and financial gains that are not available in the domestic market (Eun et al, 1996).…”
Section: Family Voting Rights and Acquisition Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, at the global scale, Taylor and Csomos (2012) present a similar reading of 'world cities' by gauging the quantity of revenue generated in cities by multinational firms headquartered there. The multifaceted and multiscalar impact of firm location on urban systems obviously also 'works' in the opposite direction: just as urban systems are shaped by the locational behavior of firms, urban systems shape the spatial distribution of corporations as the dispersion and development of firms are affected by the size and functional specialization of cities, as well as the cities' positions within the urban system (Pred, 1977;Friedland et al, 1990;Beaverstock et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%