“…First, both laboratory (Dutta et al, 1993;Jari, 1995) and wind tunnel (Kuenen, 1960;1969) experiments have found that feldspars are more fragile than quartz grains to aeolian abrasion, possibly owing to the cleavage structures of feldspars (Kuenen, 1969) and the greater propensity of 10 feldspars to weather than quartz (Nesbitt et al, 1997). Second, the feldspar content of dust is higher than that of the parent top soils in dust-producing regions, including Northern Ghana (Tiessen et al, 1991), China (Feng et al, 2008), and the UK (Moreno et al, 2003), implying the selective removal of feldspars to generate dust. Third, laboratory experiments have found that aeolian abrasion of feldspars can generate a larger fraction of the PM 10 and the PM 2.5 size ranges than generated from abrasion of quartz (Domingo et al, 2010).…”