“…As more detailed, precise, spatially registered, field-based data are contributed to the general Himalayan knowledge base, it is becoming apparent that the proposed "end members" are not mutually exclusive (e.g., Beaumont and Jamieson, 2010;Larson et al, 2010Larson et al, , 2011 www.gsapubs.org | Volume 6 | Number 5 | LITHOSPHERE 2013). Indeed, field-based studies have begun to outline a temporal and spatial continuum between the different "end-member" models (Larson et al, 2010(Larson et al, , 2011(Larson et al, , 2013Larson, 2012;Yakymchuk and Godin, 2012;Larson and Cottle, 2014). These studies describe discontinuities in the exhumed midcrust across which rocks record different deformational, metamorphic, and geochronologic histories.…”