1979
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geometric mean: Confidence limits and significance tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to determine whether there were asymmetries in ratings given to the intensity descriptors for the wet versus dry and pleasant versus unpleasant oral sensations, separate descriptor · oral sensation mixed-model ANOVAs were performed on the wet/dry and pleasant/ unpleasant data sets. In each case, the ratings given to (Alf & Grossberg, 1979). p = .19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine whether there were asymmetries in ratings given to the intensity descriptors for the wet versus dry and pleasant versus unpleasant oral sensations, separate descriptor · oral sensation mixed-model ANOVAs were performed on the wet/dry and pleasant/ unpleasant data sets. In each case, the ratings given to (Alf & Grossberg, 1979). p = .19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 25-Hz data (Figure 3), the standard errors of the mean (Alf & Grossberg, 1979) for the younger group ranged from .01 to 7.0; for the older group, they ranged from .01 to 6.9. For the 250-Hz data (Figure 4), the standard errors for the younger group ranged from .02 to 3.37; for the older group, they ranged from .02 to 2.34.…”
Section: Subjective Magnitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11. To test for significance in geometric mean return differences, we followed Alf and Grossberg (1979). 12.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%