1980
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/25/6/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geometric transfer function component for scintillation camera collimators with straight parallel holes

Abstract: A theoretical approach has been developed that allows the geometric transfer function component for conventional scintillation camera collimators to be predicted in closed form. If transfer function analysis is to be useful in describing imaging system performance, the image of a point source must not depend on source position in a plane parallel to the detection plane. This shift invariance can be achieved by analysis of system response in terms of an effective point spread function, defined as the normalised… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
4

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
65
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors demonstrated small differences between the PSFs and MTFs of triangular and hexagonal hole shapes. Metz et al (1980) derived exact expressions for the geometric component of the collimator MTF for any hole shape which confirmed these results and, additionally, treated circular and square holes. Both of these analyses used response functions averaged over the appropriate periodic "cell size" of the collimator structure.…”
Section: Spatial Resolutionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…These authors demonstrated small differences between the PSFs and MTFs of triangular and hexagonal hole shapes. Metz et al (1980) derived exact expressions for the geometric component of the collimator MTF for any hole shape which confirmed these results and, additionally, treated circular and square holes. Both of these analyses used response functions averaged over the appropriate periodic "cell size" of the collimator structure.…”
Section: Spatial Resolutionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…During each iteration, reconstructed image data are updated for each subset and spatial resolution increases with each update provided adequate noise suppression is incorporated during iterative reconstruction. Most of the current algorithms have incorporated scatter and attenuation compensation and resolution recovery techniques to minimize image blurring caused by collimators [14].…”
Section: New Image Reconstruction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, resolution recovery techniques can be incorporated to correct for losses in spatial resolution due to image blurring by the collimator. 36 The current algorithms simultaneously address these problems by modeling the instrumentation and imaging parameters used for a specific application in order to eliminate the degrading physical effects and suppress noise in the image reconstruction process. The resolution recovery aspects of these algorithms can be emphasized to provide significant improvements in spatial resolution and MPS image quality, and the noise suppression aspects can be emphasized to decrease imaging times.…”
Section: Reconstruction Algorithms For Fast Imaging With Standard Mpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach includes modeling of the integrated collimator and detector response function (CDR) in an iterative reconstruction algorithm and performs image resolution recovery 43 based on these parameters. This technique has been described in detail by DePuey et al 44 The OSEM-RR modeling includes basic collimator geometric response function for round-hole-shaped collimators 36,45 which can be applied with good approximation to hexagonal holes.…”
Section: General Electric Healthcare-evolution Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%