2021
DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2020.1842523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geometry of mesoscale eddies in the South China Sea: characteristics and implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data required for the hydrodynamic flow model from MIKE 21 consists of bathymetry and topography data, river discharge from the main connected river, meteorological parameters, sediment properties and bed resistance. Figure 1 depicted a location of the study area and situated facing the South China Sea which the tidal dynamic and circulation of current pattern in this area are mostly influenced by the geographical, topographical and monsoon winds which agreed by many previous studies (Wyrtki, 1961;Chu et al, 2004;Zu et al, 2008;Han et al, 2021). For Kelantan Coast model, the computational domain is enclosed by four boundaries consists of the shoreline, an offshore boundary, and two open cross-sections in the lateral boundary (Ding et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Data required for the hydrodynamic flow model from MIKE 21 consists of bathymetry and topography data, river discharge from the main connected river, meteorological parameters, sediment properties and bed resistance. Figure 1 depicted a location of the study area and situated facing the South China Sea which the tidal dynamic and circulation of current pattern in this area are mostly influenced by the geographical, topographical and monsoon winds which agreed by many previous studies (Wyrtki, 1961;Chu et al, 2004;Zu et al, 2008;Han et al, 2021). For Kelantan Coast model, the computational domain is enclosed by four boundaries consists of the shoreline, an offshore boundary, and two open cross-sections in the lateral boundary (Ding et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…(2019) and Han et al. (2021). First, the eddy boundary Po=()xPo,yPo ${P}_{o}=\left({x}_{Po},{y}_{Po}\right)$ was transformed from an earth‐centric coordinate Co=()xCo,yCo ${C}_{o}=\left({x}_{Co},{y}_{Co}\right)$ to an eddy‐centric coordinate C by using the following equations xPc=()xPoxCo×λ×cos()yPo ${x}_{Pc}^{\prime }=\left({x}_{Po}-{x}_{Co}\right)\times \lambda \times \mathrm{cos}\left({y}_{Po}\right)$ yPc=()yPoyCo×λ ${y}_{Pc}^{\prime }=\left({y}_{Po}-{y}_{Co}\right)\times \lambda $ C=(0,0) $C=(0,0)$ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We fitted the eddy boundary into the best ellipse by referring to Chen et al (2019) and Han et al (2021). First, the eddy boundary 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜 = (𝑥𝑥𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜, 𝑦𝑦𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜) was transformed from an earth-centric coordinate 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜 = (𝑥𝑥𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜, 𝑦𝑦𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜) to an eddy-centric coordinate C by using the following equations…”
Section: Elliptic Fitting Of Eddiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations