2014
DOI: 10.4171/rmi/819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geometry of the dyadic maximal operator

Abstract: We prove a sharp integral inequality which connects the dyadic maximal operator with the Hardy operator. We also give some applications of this inequality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The construction in the next Lemma appears also in [11] and provides the other half of Theorem 1. We include a simpler proof for completeness.…”
Section: Trees and Maximal Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The construction in the next Lemma appears also in [11] and provides the other half of Theorem 1. We include a simpler proof for completeness.…”
Section: Trees and Maximal Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A way to study estimates for the above maximal operator is through the symmetrization of φ as has been introduced in [5] and [13] and used in [8] to evaluate Bellman functions related to Lorentz norms. In order to apply this in the context of weights we introduce the following condition on a weight w on X.…”
Section: Trees Maximal Operators and Symmetrizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover the corresponding constants c, a can be easily seen to be a = 1 p−1−b , c = k p−1−b . Now we take into consideration the following theorem proved in [13] and [5]. Theorem 1.…”
Section: Trees Maximal Operators and Symmetrizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [10] we let a ∈ (0, 1). Using Lemma 2.1 we choose for every I ∈ T a family F(I) ⊆ T of disjoint subsets of I such that…”
Section: The Rearrangement Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By providing a generalization of the symmetrization principle given in [10] we give another proof of the computation for the Bellman function of three variables of the dyadic maximal operator,different from those given in [3] and [11].…”
Section: The Above Imply Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%