The geopolitical overlay of the hydropolitics of the Harirud River Basin

Abstract

This paper explores the geopolitical overlay that is shaping dynamic hydropolitical interactions of the Harirud River Basin, which is a basin that spans Afghanistan, Iran and Turkmenistan. This paper argues that the control and capture of water resources are not solely for economic development but rather for geopolitical reasons that serve the security interests of the actors involved, particularly outside-basin powers like the US and India. The Afghan Government similarly views dams as symbols of nation-building and a way of staying in power. In the absence of a lasting trilateral agreement, the existing nature of the geopolitical dynamics of the basin has led upstream Afghanistan and downstream Iran and Turkmenistan to unilaterally establish their rights to control the "rules of the game". This paper suggests that sustainable solutions will not be reached unless the geopolitical nature of the basin and outside interventions can center on a normative understanding of the regional interests, identities, and commonalities of all the riparian states.

An Analysis of the Urban Development Process in Six Major Cities in Afghanistan from 1978-2018

“…Also, the military presence of US-led NATO forces along with the rapid economic growth in Afghanistan triggered Afghan rural communities to move to urban areas [29]. Of course, climate change-induced drought [13][14]20] along with insecurity also forced farmers to migrate to nearby cities [8,25]. It is argued that more than one million Afghan people are in need of food and water in Herat city [32].…”

Small is beautiful but not trendy: Understanding the allure of big hydraulic works in the Euphrates-Tigris and Nile waterscapes

“…There are often strategic reasonings that compel state elites to appeal for building big hydraulic works. For instance, Nagheeby and Warner (2018) show how controlling water resources has become a strategy of the Superpowers -US and USSR -to control the land in the context of Afghanistan. Fourth, this paper also suggests the necessity of considering the economic arguments put forward for or against large hydraulic works, including the economy of scale.…”

Challenging hydro-hegemony of India: resistance of Nepal in the Upper Karnali and Saptakoshi dam project

“…The negative correlation between the rising water demand and uneven and dwindling water reserves has induced a historic concern over the access, usage, and control over the water resources that has a direct bearing over the norms of the hydropolitical relation vis-a-vis security, water fuelled diplomacy and the interstate relationships. However, throughout the history, water resource has often been mismanaged, misallocated, undervalued and squandered by many societies (Zeitoun et al 2010;Mirumachi 2015;Shrestha 2016;Nagheeby and Warner 2018). The historical trajectory of the scholarship in water politics suggests that the hydropolitics has gained currency since late 1980s, when water obtained attention as one of the major elements for conflict, social and economic disruptions (Mollinga 2008;Morrisette and Borer 2013).…”