2020
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1742909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geriatric syndrome of sarcopenia impacts allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes in older lymphoma patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This diminution continues but less strongly until the end of first-line treatment. The reduction of SMA and SMI and consequent sarcopenia gain during the course of treatment was already demonstrated by other studies [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Compared to these studies where the rate of sarcopenia at baseline ranged from 27% to 55%, the rate of sarcopenia in our population was higher with 66% at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This diminution continues but less strongly until the end of first-line treatment. The reduction of SMA and SMI and consequent sarcopenia gain during the course of treatment was already demonstrated by other studies [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Compared to these studies where the rate of sarcopenia at baseline ranged from 27% to 55%, the rate of sarcopenia in our population was higher with 66% at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This is due to the advanced age (>65 years) of our patients. The only paper specific to older lymphoma [ 12 ] reported a rate of sarcopenia of 55%, but they included many lymphoma variants (only eight HL) and the age criterion of inclusion was superior to 50 years, lower than us. For these reasons, a direct comparison with other studies seems to be difficult and excessive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the JBI tool for cohort studies, category seven assesses the validity of the survival outcomes, and we found that only two studies 14 , 15 clearly reported that survival was reported based on official national death records. Four studies 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 did not provide a statement on how death was reported, and this ambiguity introduced bias. Quality assessment of these studies is presented in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among hematologic malignancies, sarcopenia has been mostly evaluated in patients with lymphoma, and to a lesser extent in patients with leukemia. While some studies have found sarcopenia to be associated with inferior outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy [ 8 13 ] and transplant [ 14 17 ], others have shown no prognostic impact [ 18 ], or even a protective role of sarcopenia [ 19 ]. These discordant results are, at least in part, explained by variability in the populations and subgroups studied and differences in the thresholds used to define sarcopenia [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%