The German Association for Foot and Ankle (D.A.F.) registry on treatment of end-stage total ankle arthritis—what is its clinical impact?

Kostuj, Tanja; Preis, Markus; Walther, Markus; Aghayev, Emin

doi:10.1007/s00132-023-04384-4

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hopital Prive Jean Mermoz Shoulder [ 398 ] 2. Hôpital Edouard Herriot [ 280 , 361 ] Nice Hopital Pasteur 2 Shoulder, Universite Cote d’Azur [ 398 ] Paris SoFCOT Group [ 41 , 102 , 104 , 115 , 130 , 340 , 657 ] Germany Dresden 1. ORTHOTEP University HS Carl Gustav Carus [ 109 , 619 ] 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Minneapolis Veteran’s Affairs (VA) [ 185 ] 3. Minnesota University [ 136 , 160 , 345 ] Missouri Barnes-Jewish HS Washington University [ 56 , 133 , 141 , 162 , 184 , 213 , 230 , 285 , 400 , 421 , 448 , 644 , 657 ] New Mexico (JRR) New Mexico Orthopaedics [ 16 ] New York 1. CHKR [ 74 ] 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The principal limit is that the institutional or hospital-based JARs data may not be fully accessible for several reasons. First, there are Level IV JARs, such as the “ German Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association's (D. A. F.)” registry [ 657 ], that only publish studies in their native language. Thus they are not included in this report.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II–IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

Zgouridou,

Kenanidis,

Potoupnis

et al. 2023

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II–IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II–IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data. Methods Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II–IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications’ number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs. Results One hundred five Level II–IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case–control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies. Conclusions This is the first study mapping all Level II–IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II–IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

Zgouridou,

Kenanidis,

Potoupnis

et al. 2023

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2 The number of performed TARs is still rising. 3,4 Despite improvements, the revision rates are relatively high after TAR, ranging from 6.7% to 27.3%, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] whereas in recent studies, survival rates after transfibular TAR of 100% after 2 years in 159 cases and 98.9% in a prospective study including 89 cases could be reached. 15,16 Revision rates after TAR are tendentiously higher compared to ankle fusion and also compared to total hip or knee joint replacement.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study

Claaßen

Luedtke

Nebel

et al. 2021

Foot & Ankle Specialist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Revision rates after total ankle replacements (TARs) are higher compared with other total joint replacements. The present study aimed to establish a new patient-specific implantation (PSI) technique for TAR. Material and methods A total of 10 complete Caucasian cadaver legs had whole leg computed tomography scans. The individual geometrical ankle joint axis was determined, and based on this axis, the position of the prosthesis was planned. We assessed prosthesis placement, guiding block position, and preoperative and postoperative ankle rotational axes. Results The guiding block position interobserver reliability was 0.37 mm 0.45 (mean ± SD) for the tibial guiding block. The value for the first talar guiding block was 1.72 ± 1.3 mm and for the second talar guiding block, 0.61 ± 0.39 mm. The tibial slope as well as the frontal angles of the anatomical tibial axis compared to the tibial and talar articular surfaces showed no statistically relevant differences with numbers available. The deviation of the assessed preoperative joint axis to the postoperative joint axis was 14.6° ± 7.8. Conclusion The present study describes the results of an establishing process of a new PSI technique for TAR. The reliability of guiding block positioning and, thereby, prosthesis placement is sufficient. Level of Evidence: Biomechanical study

show abstract

“…To get the necessary numbers, we'll need to take advantage of national registries. National registries evaluating outcomes after ankle arthroplasty already exist in many countries including Sweden, France, Canada, and Germany [3,4,7,10]. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society could start a registry and encourage all members to enroll their patients.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

CORR Insights®: How Does a Novel In Situ Fixed-bearing Implant Design Perform in Revision Ankle Arthroplasty in the Short Term? A Survival, Clinical, and Radiologic Analysis

Shakked

2023

Clin Orthop Relat Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The German Association for Foot and Ankle (D.A.F.) registry on treatment of end-stage total ankle arthritis—what is its clinical impact?

Cited by 3 publications

References 14 publications

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II–IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II–IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

Establishing a New Patient-Specific Implantation Technique for Total Ankle Replacement: An In Vitro Study

CORR Insights®: How Does a Novel In Situ Fixed-bearing Implant Design Perform in Revision Ankle Arthroplasty in the Short Term? A Survival, Clinical, and Radiologic Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About