The German Constitutional Court and Preliminary References—Still a Match not Made in Heaven?

Abstract

So far, the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, henceforth:BVerfG) has only made a single preliminary reference to the (now) Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), despite frequent rulings on matters connected with European Union (EU) Law. Its apparent reluctance seemed odd considering the atmosphere of dialogue and cooperation which prevails between the non-constitutional courts and the EU courts. This situation might, however, have changed with the preliminary reference from January 2014, proving predictions on the perceived “most powerful constitutional court” and its relationship to the EU partly wrong. The legal effects of its preliminary reference on the interpretation of Articles 119, 123, 127 ff. of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the validity of Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT) by the European Central Bank (ECB) under EU Law are as yet unclear; although the Opinion of the Advocate General Cruz Villalón was delivered in the beginning of 2015, which did not confirm the doubts expressed by theBVerfGabout the conformity of the OMT programme with EU law. Nonetheless, the interpretative scheme and the normative questions as to the reluctance of theBVerfGremain the same after this single referral and offer explanations as to why theBVerfGhad for nearly sixty years not referred a question to the former European Court of Justice (ECJ).

The End of History in EU Law and Politics? Challenging Founding Narratives with a New Research Agenda

“…For example, the Supreme Court of Denmark explicitly defied the CJEU's caselaw in the 2016 Ajos case, highlighting "institutional frictions which have been building for some time, and [providing] an example of irreconcilable judicial perceptions of the relationship between national and EU law" (Madsen et al 2017, 141). The German Constitutional Court has long had a testy relationship with the CJEU and often resists its rulings when they impinge on fundamental rights or the democratic process, including in its 2020 Weiss decision (e.g., Burchardt 2020;Lohse 2015). The Czech Constitutional Court declared the CJEU's judgment in the 2012 Landtova case ultra vries, stating that the CJEU "had overstepped the boundaries of the powers transferred to the European Union by the Czech Republic" (Dyevre 2016, 107).…”

The Integration of Judicial Review in Indonesia

“…The application of one-roof statutory judicial review is also carried out in Germany, where the Constitutional Court has the authority to immediately judicial review statutory regulations under the Basic Law as regulated in Article 93, Members." (Lohse, 2015).…”